ReviewJournal of orthopaedics2023
Radial head replacement - A comprehensive review.
Review in Journal of orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Uncementing the status quo: systematic review of a loose-fit, polished stem radial head prosthesis shows stable clinical results in complex elbow injuries with a concomitant radial head fracture.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Pooled it
- Implant selection and fixation in radial head arthroplasty: A qualitative analysis of surgeon decision-making.Shoulder & elbow · 2026Article
- Stem design in radial head arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty · 2026Review
- Article
- Clinical relevance of postoperative radial neck osteolysis after modular press-fit pyrocarbon radial head arthroplasty: a retrospective radiographic-functional correlation study.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Observational
- Hawkins Award 2025: clinical implications of radiological findings associated with radial head replacement. A long-term follow-up study.JSES international · 2026Article
- Temporary Cemented Spacer for Complex Radial Head Fractures: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
- Radial head arthroplasty: A pillar of stability in complex elbow fractures.World journal of orthopedics · 2025Article
- Radial Head Prosthesis with Interconnected Porosity Showing Low Bone Resorption Around the Stem.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Functional outcomes of radial head arthroplasty in Mason type III and IV fractures.World journal of orthopedics · 2025Article
- A proposal for computed tomography-based algorithm for the management of radial head and neck fractures: the Proximal and Articular Radial fractures Management (PARMa) classification.JSES international · 2025Article
- Article
- Early Callus as an Adverse Prognostic Sign Following Radial Head Replacement for Trauma.Cureus · 2024Article
- Monobloc vs. Modular Radial-Head Arthroplasty for Complex Elbow Trauma: Long-Term Follow-Up and Comparative Evaluation.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Radial head fractures represent 1-4% of all adult fractures and 1/3rd of elbow fractures (Kaas et al., 2010). Radial head is an important secondary stabilier of the elbow. The aim of the treatment of radial head fractures is to achieve stability and good functional outcome. Radial head replacement (RHR) is indicated when robust reconstruction and fixation of the fracture fragments is not possible. Methods: This article explores history and evolution, anatomical considerations, biomechanics, implant designs, indications, surgical outcomes and controversies in radial head replacement based on current evidence. Results: There is a wide range of RHR designs available without conclusive evidence to support the superiority of one design over the other. Ranges of motion, functional outcomes and complication were comparable among different designs with a high incidence of complications reported in many studies. Conclusion: RHR remains a good option in unreconstructible radial head fractures, with potential to regain excellent function. It is imperative to continue with the quest to innovate and improve on current designs, to reduce complications in the long term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.