Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36632249›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Assessment of the Diagnostic Value of Novel Biomarkers in Adult Patients With Acute Appendicitis: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Murat Duyan, Nafis Vural

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evaluation of computed tomography (CT) appendicitis score and laboratory parameters in acute appendicitis with and without CT-detected appendicolith.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The role of infectious parameters in the early prediction of complicated colonic diverticulitis.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Murat DuyanEmergency Medicine, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, TUR.
Nafis VuralEmergency Medicine, Akdeniz University Hospital, Antalya, TUR.
Akdeniz University Hospital · TRAntalya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Acute appendicitis (AA) is one of the most frequent causes of abdominal pain requiring emergency intervention in adults. Approximately one-third of cases present with atypical clinical symptoms. This study aims to compare the monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), red cell distribution width (RDW) to lymphocyte ratio (RLR), and systemic immune inflammation index (SII) with other biomarkers in distinguishing patients with and without AA. Methodology A total of 347 patients (AA 125, nonspecific abdominal pain 90, and control group 132) were enrolled in the study according to the cross-sectional study design. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the cutoff in diagnostic value measurements. Statistical significance was determined by the statistics of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Comparison of ROC curves of C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell (WBC), neutrophil count (NEU), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), MLR, and SII was evaluated with the pairwise comparison of ROC curves and 95% confidence interval. Results In detecting AA, CRP, WBC, NEU, NLR, MLR, and SII have excellent diagnostic power (area under the curve [AUC] 0.80-0.88), while RDW, lymphocyte count, monocyte (MON) count, and RLR had acceptable diagnostic power (AUC 0.70-0.77). When the power in the diagnosis of AA was compared, a significant difference was found between CRP and NEU, CRP and SII, WBC and NEU, and WBC and SII. Conclusions The diagnosis of AA remains dependent on many factors. Inflammatory biomarkers assist this process. MLR and SII may be recommended to use in diagnosing AA in adults, along with other clinical findings. RLR is adequate but not superior.

Indexed as

acute appendicitisbiomarkerdiagnosismonocyte-to-lymphocyte rationeutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratiosystemic immune inflammation index

Identifiers

PMID36632249
PMCPMC9828092
OpenAlexW4311853316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.