Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36632238›Full record

ArticleToxicon: X2023

Multifaceted community health education programs as powerful tools to mitigate snakebite-induced deaths, disabilities, and socioeconomic burden.

Sakthivel Vaiyapuri, Priyanka Kadam, Gnaneswar Chandrasekharuni, Isadora S Oliveira, Subramanian Senthilkumaran, Anika Salim, Ketan Patel, Jacqueline de Almeida Gonçalves Sachett, Manuela B Pucca

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicon: X, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Utilising snake rescue data to understand snake-human conflict in Hooghly, West Bengal, India.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Sakthivel VaiyapuriSchool of Pharmacy, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6UB, UK.
Priyanka KadamSnakebite Healing & Education Society, Mumbai, India.
Gnaneswar ChandrasekharuniMadras Crocodile Bank Trust, Mamallapuram, Tamil Nadu, India.
Isadora S OliveiraDepartment of Biomolecular Sciences, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Subramanian SenthilkumaranManian Medical Centre, Erode, Tamil Nadu, India.
Anika SalimSchool of Pharmacy, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6UB, UK.
Ketan PatelSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6UB, UK.
Jacqueline de Almeida Gonçalves SachettNurse School, State University of Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
Manuela B PuccaMedical School, Federal University of Roraima, Boa Vista, Brazil.
University of Reading · GBMadras Diabetes Research Foundation · INPeriyar Maniammai Institute of Science & Technology · INUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade do Estado do Amazonas · BRUniversidade Federal de Roraima · BR

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/W019353/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Snakebite envenoming (SBE) predominantly affects rural impoverished communities that have limited access to immediate healthcare. These communities often hold numerous myths/misbeliefs about snakes and SBE. Moreover, healthcare professionals who practice in rural regions often work in unstable situations with limited medical infrastructure and therefore, lack sufficient knowledge/experience and confidence in the clinical management of SBE. Due to the lack of reliable statistics on the true burden of SBE, developing health policies for this condition by relevant authorities may be difficult. Hence, it is critical to improve awareness about SBE among rural communities, healthcare professionals and health authorities using robust multifaceted community health education approaches. Here, we describe the design, development, implementation, and impact of distinctive community health education approaches that we used in India and Brazil. A wide range of educational tools including information leaflets, posters, pocket guides, learning materials for healthcare professionals and short/long video documentaries were developed in local languages and used to engage with target communities through direct assemblies as well as mass/traditional and social media. Notably, we used diverse methods to determine the impact of our programs in improving awareness, treatment-seeking behaviour, and clinical practice. The people-centred approaches that we used were inclusive and highly impactful in instigating fundamental changes in the management of SBE among rural communities. The resources and approaches presented in this article can be easily adapted for wider use in other countries in order to collectively reduce SBE-induced deaths, disabilities and socioeconomic ramifications.

Indexed as

Community health educationHealthcare professionalshealth policiesPublic awarenessRural communitiesSnakebite envenomingSocioeconomic impact

Identifiers

PMID36632238
PMCPMC9827049
OpenAlexW4313419001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.