Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36632196›Full record

ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2023

Commentary on Ultrasound Instruction in Undergraduate Medical Education: Perspective from Two Students.

Austin J Allen, Alexander B White, Daniel R Bacon, Gary L Beck Dallaghan, Sheryl G Jordan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Austin J Allen *University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9512-0133
Alexander B White *University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9281-2932
Daniel R BaconDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Gary L Beck DallaghanDepartment of Medical Education, University of Texas at Tyler School of Medicine, Tyler, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8539-6969
Sheryl G JordanDepartment of Radiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6686-2100
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USThe Ohio State University · USThe University of Texas at Tyler · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ultrasound integration in undergraduate medical education (UME) has been a focused endeavor in recent years. According to the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, more than a third of all US medical schools have adopted a focused ultrasound training program for medical students. Medical student perspectives on best practices in ultrasound education are lacking in the literature. Curricula Experiences: Two students' reflections are presented regarding two different didactic approaches, flipped classroom and self-study learning models, to teaching ultrasound in the pre-clinical medical education curriculum. Students present reflections on these didactic approaches to facilitate further improvement in ultrasound education curricula. Discussion: The self-directed learning model enabled students to learn foundational ultrasound exam techniques efficiently in a low-stress environment and subsequently optimized the efficiency of later faculty-led learning events. However, we noted that in both the flipped classroom and self-study learning models of education, the training on basic physical properties of ultrasound, tissue characteristics, and probe manipulation was limited. Conclusion: A self-study learning model ultrasound curricula improves perceived learning efficiency and student confidence, especially when followed by faculty-guided didactics and scanning opportunities. We suggest a framework for ultrasound education curricula that includes components of both formats of ultrasound education alongside faculty-led sessions as an ideal model of ultrasound education. Further, we propose the added benefit of inanimate object scanning to optimize students' knowledge of waveform physics (image acquisition and physical properties of materials) early in the ultrasound education process.

Indexed as

educationmedicalultrasonographyultrasonography educationultrasoundundergraduate

Identifiers

PMID36632196
PMCPMC9827631
OpenAlexW4313453147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.