Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36632181›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2023

Neuroanatomical mapping of the lumbosacral spinal cord in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury.

Samineh Mesbah, April Herrity, Beatrice Ugiliweneza, Claudia Angeli, Yury Gerasimenko, Maxwell Boakye, Susan Harkema

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Brain communications · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Samineh MesbahKentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
April HerrityKentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
Beatrice UgiliwenezaKentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7334-6924
Claudia AngeliKentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4127-7121
Yury GerasimenkoDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
Maxwell BoakyeKentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
Susan HarkemaKentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
University of Louisville · US

Funding

Functional Mapping with Lumbosacral Epidural Stimulation for Restoration of Bladder Function After Spinal Cord InjuryOT2OD024898 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI HARKEMA, SUSAN J, HUBSCHER, CHARLES H. · 2017 to 2021
$6.0M
Transformation of Paraplegic Paralysis to Overground Stepping in HumansR01NS102920 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI OVECHKIN, ALEXANDER VLADIMIROVICH · 2019 to 2023
$2.8M
NIH HHS OT2 OD024898
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With emerging applications of spinal cord electrical stimulation in restoring autonomic and motor function after spinal cord injury, understanding the neuroanatomical substrates of the human spinal cord after spinal cord injury using neuroimaging techniques can play a critical role in optimizing the outcomes of these stimulation-based interventions. In this study, we have introduced a neuroimaging acquisition and analysis protocol of the spinal cord in order to identify: (i) spinal cord levels at the lumbosacral enlargement using nerve root tracing; (ii) variability in the neuroanatomical characteristics of the spinal cord among individuals; (iii) location of the epidural stimulation paddle electrode and contacts with respect to the spinal cord levels at lumbosacral enlargement; and (iv) the links between the anatomical levels of stimulation and the corresponding neurophysiological motor responses. Twelve individuals with chronic, motor complete spinal cord injury implanted with a spinal cord epidural stimulator were included in the study (age: 34 ± 10.9 years, sex: 10 males, 2 females, time since injury: 8.2 ± 9.9 years, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale: 6 A, 6 B). High-resolution MRI scans of the spinal cord were recorded pre-implant. An analysis of neuroanatomical substrates indicates that the length of the spinal column and spinal cord, location of the conus tip and the relationship between the spinal cord levels and vertebral levels, particularly at the lumbosacral enlargement, are variable across individuals. There is no statistically significant correlation between the length of the spinal column and the length of the spinal cord. The percentage of volumetric coverage of the lumbosacral spinal cord by the epidural stimulation paddle electrode ranges from 33.4 to 90.4% across participants. The location of the spinal cord levels with respect to the electrode contacts varies across individuals and impacts the recruitment patterns of neurophysiological responses. Finally, MRI-based spinal cord modelling can be used as a guide for the prediction and preplanning of optimum epidural stimulation paddle placement prior to the implant surgery to ensure maximizing functional outcomes. These findings highlight the crucial role that the neuroanatomical characteristics of the spinal cord specific to each individual play in achieving maximum functional benefits with spinal cord electrical stimulation.

Indexed as

epidural stimulationMRIneuromodulationspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID36632181
PMCPMC9825531
OpenAlexW4313403566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.