ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2022
Identification of risk factors and clinical model construction of abdominal distension after radical cystectomy.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable machine learning to predict postoperative ileus after radical cystectomy: an 11-year real-world cohort.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Effects of multimodal nursing intervention with health education on recovery, pain, and psychological outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Abdominal distension following radical cystectomy: what we know and what we need to know.Translational andrology and urology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The occurrence of abdominal distention after radical cystectomy (RC) is common. We sought to determine risk factors of abdominal distention after RC, and to establish a simple and reliable nomogram for clinical risk assessment. Methods: Clinical information on 139 patients who underwent RC from January 2020 to August 2021 was collected. The chi-square test, hypergeometric test, and univariate/multivariate logistic regression were utilized to explore the relationship between variables and abdominal distention after RC. A nomogram was then used to predict the probability of abdominal distension for the patients who underwent RC. Calibration and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the accuracy of the model. Results: We found that 35 patients (25%) occurred in abdominal distention after RC. Among the patients, 7 of them developed intestinal obstruction. Postoperative water fasting time and abdominal surgery history were independent risk factors for abdominal distension after surgery. Finally, we constructed a risk model to predict the probability of abdominal distension after surgery. This model showed good fitting and calibration and excellent diagnostic performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.804. Conclusions: Postoperative water fasting time and abdominal surgery history were independent risk factors for abdominal distension after surgery. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative abdominal distention between robot-assisted cystectomy and laparoscopic cystectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.