Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36632121›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2022

Development of a prediction model for enteral feeding intolerance in intensive care unit patients: A prospective cohort study.

Xue-Mei Lu, Deng-Shuai Jia, Rui Wang, Qing Yang, Shan-Shan Jin, Lan Chen

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Use of Machine Learning Models to Predict Microaspiration Measured by Tracheal Pepsin A.American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses · 2025
    Article
  13. Feeding Intolerance in Critically Ill Patients with Enteral Nutrition: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xue-Mei LuSchool of Nursing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200025, China.
Deng-Shuai JiaSchool of Nursing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200025, China.
Rui WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200080, China.
Qing YangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200080, China.
Shan-Shan JinDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200080, China.
Lan ChenDepartment of Nursing, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200080, China. 13636317690@126.com.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnteral nutrition (EN) is essential for critically ill patients. However, some patients will have enteral feeding intolerance (EFI) in the process of EN.

aimTo develop a clinical prediction model to predict the risk of EFI in patients receiving EN in the intensive care unit.

methodsA prospective cohort study was performed. The enrolled patients' basic information, medical status, nutritional support, and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms were recorded. The baseline data and influencing factors were compared. Logistic regression analysis was used to establish the model, and the bootstrap resampling method was used to conduct internal validation.

resultsThe sample cohort included 203 patients, and 37.93% of the patients were diagnosed with EFI. After the final regression analysis, age, GI disease, early feeding, mechanical ventilation before EN started, and abnormal serum sodium were identified. In the internal validation, 500 bootstrap resample samples were performed, and the area under the curve was 0.70 (95%CI: 0.63-0.77).

conclusionThis clinical prediction model can be applied to predict the risk of EFI.

Indexed as

Clinical prediction modelCritical care medicineCritical care nursingEnteral feeding intoleranceNutritional supportNutrition assessment

Identifiers

PMID36632121
PMCPMC9827569
OpenAlexW4312198486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.