Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36632109›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Instructors' perceptions and use of first language in EFL classes in Afghanistan.

Sayeed Naqibullah Orfan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sayeed Naqibullah OrfanEnglish Department, School of Language and Literature, Takhar University, Afghanistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study examined instructors' arguments for and against the use of L1 in EFL classes. It explored the frequency use and functions of L1. It also investigated the impact of the participants' gender, education level and years of teaching experience on their responses. A survey questionnaire and classroom observations were used to collect data from 189 and 5 EFL instructors, respectively. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data. The results showed that EFL instructors had mixed perceptions about L1 use in EFL classes. They believed that L1 had both facilitative roles (e.g. helping students build up their lexicon) and negative consequences (e.g., interfering in students' learning). Furthermore, the instructors utilized L1 for various language, classroom management and social purposes to varying extent. L1 was more frequently used to explain difficult grammatical points, new vocabulary and difficult concepts. Instructors favored and used L1 more frequently in low-level classes than higher levels. The study also revealed that there were statistically significant differences between participants' responses by their gender, education and years of teaching experience. The study recommends EFL instructors to revisit their use of L1 in EFL classes and use it judiciously and systematically to optimize students' English learning and prevent negative consequences of the overuse of L1 (e.g., learners' dependence on L1).

Indexed as

EFL classroomsInstitutional cultureL1 useLanguage teachingTeaching strategy

Identifiers

PMID36632109
PMCPMC9826865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.