Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36632090›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

WeWhoCurie: An Initiative to Advocate for Those Underrepresented in Radiation Oncology.

Joy Ogunmuyiwa, Sara Beltrán Ponce, Crystal Seldon, Kelly Paradis, Amanda Khan, Michael Dyer, Parul N Barry, Hina Saeed, Jenna M Kahn, Afua A Yorke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Joy OgunmuyiwaNew York-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Brooklyn, New York.
Sara Beltrán PonceMedical College of Wisconsin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Crystal SeldonUniversity of Miami/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami, Florida.
Kelly ParadisMichigan Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Amanda KhanTom Baker Cancer Center, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Michael DyerDana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Parul N BarryUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Hina SaeedLynn Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Baptist Health South Florida, Boca Raton, Florida.
Jenna M KahnOregon Health and Science University, Department of Radiation Medicine, Portland, Oregon.
Afua A YorkeUniversity of Washington, Department of Radiation Oncology, Seattle, Washington.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: An initiative to advocate for those underrepresented in radiation oncology. Methods and Materials: Inspired by the success of the #ILookLikeAnEngineer and #ILookLikeASurgeon campaigns, this initiative aimed to break down stereotypes in traditionally male-dominated fields. In honor of Marie Curie's birthday, on November 7, 2018, the Society for Women in Radiation Oncology launched a social media campaign called #WomenWhoCurie day. However, as the popularity of the social media campaign increased, it become evident that members of the wider radiation community, in particular women of color, nonbinary and transgender people did not feel supported by the #WomenWhoCurie movement. In November 2021, after consultation with diversity and inclusion leaders and members of other national radiation oncology organizations, Society for Women in Radiation Oncology launched #WeWhoCurie alongside the #WomenWhoCurie campaign for women and gender minorities in radiation oncology. Radiation oncologists, physicists, dosimetrist, therapists, nurses, and other professionals from around the world gathered and shared photos and social media posts throughout the day on multiple platforms including Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. Results: In the year #WeWhoCurie, #WomenWhoCurie, #_______ WhoCurie campaign launched, we saw an increase in participation across the globe from 9 countries: the United States, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Italy, Spain, China, New Zealand, and Australia. There were over 720 tweets contributing to the campaign with over 2000 messages, representing 3,365,444 "potential impacts", or the number of times someone saw the hashtag. Conclusions: Through this campaign we aim to celebrate the incredible women, gender minorities, and allies who are "Curie-

Identifiers

PMID36632090
PMCPMC9827353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.