Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36632088›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Radiation Therapy Modulates Tumor Physical Characteristics to Reduce Intratumoral Pressure and Enhance Intratumoral Drug Delivery and Retention.

Hampartsoum B Barsoumian, Rahul A Sheth, Rishab Ramapriyan, Ethan Hsu, Mihai Gagea, Kaitlyn Crowley, Duygu Sezen, Malea Williams, James W Welsh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Hampartsoum B BarsoumianDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Rahul A ShethDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Rishab RamapriyanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Ethan HsuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Mihai GageaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Kaitlyn CrowleyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Duygu SezenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Malea WilliamsDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
James W WelshDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: High intratumoral pressure, caused by tumor cell-to-cell interactions, interstitial fluid pressure, and surrounding stromal composition, plays a substantial role in resistance to intratumoral drug delivery and distribution. Radiation therapy (XRT) is commonly administered in conjunction with different intratumoral drugs, but assessing how radiation can reduce pressure locally and help intratumoral drug administration and retention is important. Methods and Materials: 344SQ-parental or 344SQ-anti-programmed cell death protein 1-resistant lung adenocarcinoma cells were established in 129Sv/Ev mice, and irradiated with either 1 Gy × 2, 5 Gy × 3, 8 Gy × 3, 12 Gy × 3, or 20 Gy × 1. Intratumoral pressure was measured every 3 to 4 days after XRT. Contrast dye was injected into the tumors 3- and 6-days after XRT, and imaged to measure drug retention. Results: In the 344SQ-parental model, low-dose radiation (1 Gy × 2) created an early window of reduced intratumoral pressure 1 to 3 days after XRT compared with untreated control. High-dose stereotactic radiation (12 Gy × 3) reduced intratumoral pressure 3 to 12 days after XRT, and 20 Gy × 1 showed a delayed pressure reduction on day 12. Intermediate doses of radiation did not significantly affect intratumoral pressure. In the more aggressive 344SQ-anti-programmed cell death protein 1-resistant model, low-dose radiation reduced pressure 1 to 5 days after XRT, and 12 Gy × 3 reduced pressure 1 to 3 days after XRT. Moreover, both 1 Gy × 2 and 12 Gy × 3 significantly improved drug retention 3 days after XRT; however, there was no significance detected 6 days after XRT. Lastly, a histopathologic evaluation showed that 1 Gy × 2 reduced collagen deposition within the tumor, and 12 Gy × 3 led to more necrotic core and higher extracellular matrix formation in the tumor periphery. Conclusions: Optimized low-dose XRT, as well as higher stereotactic XRT regimen led to a reduction in intratumoral pressure and increased drug retention. The findings from this work can be readily translated into the clinic to enhance intratumoral injections of various anticancer agents.

Identifiers

PMID36632088
PMCPMC9827361
OpenAlexW4310720047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.