Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36632087›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Prognostic Score in Radiotherapy Practice for Palliative Treatments (PROPHET) Study for Bone Metastases: An Investigation Into the Clinical Effect on Treatment Prescription.

Francesco Cellini, Alessia Di Rito, Giambattista Siepe, Francesco Pastore, Elisabetta Lattanzi, Ilaria Meaglia, Angelo Tozzi, Stefania Manfrida, Silvia Longo, Simonetta Saldi and 22 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco CelliniDipartimento Universitario Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Alessia Di RitoRadiotherapy Unit - IRCCS Istituto Tumori 'Giovanni Paolo II' Bari - Italy.
Giambattista SiepeRadiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Francesco PastoreRadiation Oncology, Fondazione Muto Onlus-Emicenter, Naples, Italy.
Elisabetta LattanziRadiation Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Ilaria MeagliaDepartment of Radiotherapy, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Angelo TozziDepartment of Radiotherapy, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Stefania ManfridaDipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Silvia LongoDipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Simonetta SaldiSection of Radiation Oncology, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
Raffaele CasseseRadiotherapy Unit, Ospedale San Camillo de Lellis, Rieti, Italy.
Fabio ArcidiaconoRadiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria di Terni, Terni, Italy.
Michele FioreResearch Unit of Radiation Oncology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma.
Valeria MasielloDipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Ciro MazzarellaDipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Antonio DiromaDipartimento Universitario Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Francesco MiccichèDipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Francesca MauriziRadiation Oncology, A.O. Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy.
Luca DominiciDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Marta ScorsettiDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Mario SantarelliRadiotherapy Unit, Ospedale San Camillo de Lellis, Rieti, Italy.
Vincenzo FuscoRadiotherapy Oncology Department, IRCCS CROB, Rionero In Vulture, Italy.
Cynthia AristeiRadiation Oncology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
Francesco DeodatoDipartimento Universitario Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Maria A GambacortaDipartimento Universitario Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Ernesto MaranzanoRadiotherapy Oncology Centre, Santa Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy.
Paolo MutoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy.
Vincenzo ValentiniDipartimento Universitario Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Alessio G MorgantiRadiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Lorenza MarinoRadiation Oncology Department, Humanitas Istituto Clinico Catanese, Misterbianco, Catania, Italy.
Costanza M DonatiRadiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Rossella Di FrancoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy.
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITAzienda USL di Bologna · ITIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri · ITIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITOspedale generale di zona San Camillo Treviso · ITUniversity of Perugia · ITAzienda Ospedaliera S.Maria · ITCentro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata · ITFondazione A.R. Card Onlus · ITHumanitas University · ITIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · ITIstituto Tumori Bari · ITOspedali Riuniti Marche Nord · ITUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · ITUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Bone metastases frequently occur during malignant disease. Palliative radiation therapy (PRT) is a crucial part of palliative care because it can relieve pain and improve patients' quality of life. Often, a clinician's survival estimation is too optimistic. Prognostic scores (PSs) can help clinicians tailor PRT indications to avoid over- or undertreatment. Although the PS is supposed to aid radiation oncologists (ROs) in palliative-care scenarios, it is unclear what type of support, and to what extent, could impact daily clinical practice. Methods and Materials: A national-based investigation of the prescriptive decisions on simulated clinical cases was performed in Italy. Nine clinical cases from real-world clinical practice were selected for this study. Each case description contained complete information regarding the parameters defining the prognosis class according to the PS (in particular, the Mizumoto Prognostic Score, a validated PS available in literature and already applied in some clinical trials). Each case description contained complete information regarding the parameters defining the prognosis class according to the PS. ROs were interviewed through questionnaires, each comprising the same 3 questions per clinical case, asking (1) the prescription after detailing the clinical case features but not the PS prognostic class definition; (2) whether the RO wanted to change the prescription once the PS prognostic class definition was revealed; and (3) in case of a change of the prescription, a new prescriptive option. Three RO categories were defined: dedicated to PRT (RO-d), nondedicated to PRT (RO-nd), and resident in training (IT). Interviewed ROs were distributed among different regions of the country. Results: Conversion rates, agreements, and prescription trends were investigated. The PS determined a statistically significant 11.12% of prescription conversion among ROs. The conversion was higher for the residents and significantly higher for worse prognostic scenario subgroups, respectively. The PS improved prescriptive agreement among ROs (particularly for worse-prognostic-scenario subgroups). Moreover, PS significantly increased standard prescriptive approaches (particularly for worse-clinical-case presentations). Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, the PROPHET study is the first to directly evaluate the potential clinical consequences of the regular application of any PS. According to the Prophet study, a prognostic score should be integrated into the clinical practice of palliative radiation therapy for bone metastasis and training programs in radiation oncology.

Identifiers

PMID36632087
PMCPMC9827357
OpenAlexW4310255398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.