Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36631815›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2023

"What medical students with better academic results do: a cross-sectional analysis".

Amaia Urrizola, Raúl Santiago, Alfredo Gea, Sandra Rubio, Anna Vilalta-Lacarra, Javier Rodríguez, Leire Arbea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amaia UrrizolaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, C/ Pio XII 36, 31008, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain. aurrizola@unav.es.
Raúl SantiagoDepartment of Educational Sciences, University of La Rioja, C/Luis de Ulloa Nº 2, 26004, Logroño, Spain.
Alfredo GeaDepartment of Medical Education, University of Navarre, C/Irunlarrea 1, 31008, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
Sandra RubioDepartment of Medical Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, C/ Pio XII 36, 31008, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
Anna Vilalta-LacarraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, C/ Pio XII 36, 31008, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
Javier RodríguezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, C/ Pio XII 36, 31008, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
Leire ArbeaDepartment of Medical Education, University of Navarre, C/Irunlarrea 1, 31008, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith university material doubling over time, medical students need to learn how to become successful life-long learners. Overall a Deep Approach (DA) to learning, and Self-Regulation (SR) skills are among the elements with a potential to accelerate learning, and Student Engagement (SE) has been associated with better university outcomes. However, specific recommendations concerning what students should do are lacking. The aim of this study was to identify above-average students' specific attitudes and strategies toward learning.

methodsA cross-sectional analysis of the answers to the validated questionnaires Revised Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F), SE, and Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) of 155 s and third-year students included in a prospective interventional study in the University of Navarre in September 2020 was performed. Students were stratified according to their standardized average mean in above-average (mean > 0) and below-average (mean ≤ 0).

resultsOverall, 67.1% of students scored higher in DA than in Surface Approach (SA) and had very high Intrinsic Value (IV, median 5.9). A higher proportion of above-average students had DA > SA score (72.7% vs 57.1%, p = 0.05), and showed higher scores in SR (median 4.9 vs 4.3, p = 0.007) compared to below-average, while the latter scored higher in SA (median 24.5 vs 23, p = 0.04), and surface motive (median 11 vs 9, p = 0.007). No differences were found in SE, and both groups had average scores in the cooperative dimension. Differences were rooted to hard work, interest over material and prioritizing understanding over rote-learning motives and aligned strategies.

conclusionsCurricula design and assessment should be aligned to promote DA and SR skills among learners. Furthermore, it is paramount that teachers help instill students with interest over material and encourage understanding and hard work, since are traits associated with better results. More studies concerning metacognition and other promising traits for becoming life-long learners and prepared professionals should be made.

Indexed as

Students, MedicalCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLearningMotivationProspective StudiesSurveys and Questionnaires“Academic performance”“Intrinsic Value”“Learning Approach”“Medical education”“Motivation”“Self-regulation”“Student Engagement”“Undergraduate education”

Identifiers

PMID36631815
PMCPMC9835338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.