ArticleBMC ophthalmology2023
Multiple linear regression model for improving accuracy of capsulorhexis size calculation in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery for adults: a retrospective single-center study.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDifferences between programmed capsulorhexis diameter and actual resulting capsulorhexis diameter (ARCD) are commonly encountered in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS). The purpose of this study was to identify the preoperative ophthalmic variables influencing capsulorhexis diameter index (CDI) in FLACS for adults and create a multiple linear regression model for obtaining a more accurate capsulorhexis diameter.
methodsThis retrospective study involved sixty-seven eyes of 44 patients who received FLACS and intraocular lens implantation. The ARCD was measured using anterior segment swept-source optical coherence tomography (CASIA 2). Keratometry (K1, K2 and average K), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), anterior chamber width (ACW), white-to-white (WTW), curvature radius of anterior lens capsule (Front R) and axial length (AL) were all measured preoperatively. Based on the derived data, LT/ACW, LT/AL, LT/ACD and LT/ACW/Front R were calculated. The ratio of the programmed capsulorhexis diameter and ARCD was defined as the CDI. Correlation analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between preoperative variables listed above and the CDI. Multiple linear regression analysis was applied to select the most influential preoperative variables on CDI.
resultsACD, LT, ACW, Front R, AL, LT/ACW, LT/AL, LT/ACD, and LT/ACW/Front R showed significant correlation with CDI. Front R and LT/ACW/Front R were selected as constants in the multiple linear regression model using stepwise variable selection. The following equation represents the multiple linear regression model: CDI = 1.306-4.516 × LT/ACW/FrontR-0.011 × Front R, when P < 0.0001, adjusted R-squared = 0.919, variance inflation factor = 8.389, and Durbin-Watson ratio = 1.846. Predicted postoperative capsulorhexis diameter (PPCD) equation was created based on CDI equation as follows: PPCD = programmed capsulorhexis diameter × 1.306-4.516 × LT/ACW/FrontR-0.011 × Front R.
conclusionFront R and LT/ACW/Front R were found to be the most significant influencing factors of capsulorhexis size. CDI and PPCD calculation equations presented in this study may be useful in setting up more accurate programmed capsulorhexis diameter for FLACS in adults, resulting in a precise ARCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.