Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36631743›Full record

Trial reportBMC geriatrics2023

"It's all about the money": an interpretive description of embedding physical therapy-led falls prevention group exercise in long-term care.

Elizabeth Binns, Felicity Bright, John Parsons, Kathy Peri, Lynne Taylor, Ngaire Kerse, Denise Taylor

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions for preventing falls in older people in care facilities.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth BinnsPhysiotherapy Department, Auckland University of Technology, Wellesley Campus, Private Bag 92006, 1142, Auckland, New Zealand. liz.binns@aut.ac.nz.
Felicity BrightPhysiotherapy Department, Auckland University of Technology, Wellesley Campus, Private Bag 92006, 1142, Auckland, New Zealand.
John ParsonsSchool of Nursing, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Kathy PeriSchool of Nursing, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Lynne TaylorSchool of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Ngaire KerseSchool of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Denise TaylorHealth and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
University of Auckland · NZAuckland University of Technology · NZEducation New Zealand · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFalls prevention interventions are effective for community dwelling older adults however, the same cannot be said for older adults living in long-term care (LTC). The Staying UpRight (SUp) randomized controlled trial was designed to test the effectiveness of a progressive strength and balance group exercise program delivered to LTC residents. This paper explores the factors impacting LTC providers' decisions to continue the program on completion of the funded trial period.

methodsA qualitative study using an Interpretive Description approach. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with 15 LTC staff involved in the randomized controlled trial. Data were analysed using conventional content analysis.

resultsPractice change occurred following participation in the trial with some facilities starting exercise groups, some increasing the number of exercise groups offered and physical therapists selecting elements of the program to adopt into their practice. Decisions about continuing with SUp as designed were constrained by organizational decisions regarding funding and resources. Three factors were identified which informed decision-making: business models and philosophies, requirements for evidence, and valuing physical therapy.

conclusionsManagers and facilitators adapted SUp by selecting and delivering components of the program in response to the changes they had observed in participating residents. However, our findings highlight that while SUp was valued, the tight financial environment created by the current funding model in New Zealand did not support funding physical therapist delivered falls prevention exercise programs in LTC. This study may provide policy makers with important information on changes needed to support falls prevention service delivery in LTC.

trial registrationThis study is a sub-study of a randomized controlled trial which was registered to the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12618001827224 on 09/11/2018. Universal trial number U1111-1217-7148.

Indexed as

ExerciseLong-Term CareAgedAustraliaExercise TherapyHumansIndependent LivingPhysical Therapy ModalitiesFalls preventionLong-term careOlder adultsQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID36631743
PMCPMC9832407
OpenAlexW4315567929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.