Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36631741›Full record

ReviewThe Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry2024

Mapping the Iceberg of Autonomic Recovery: Mechanistic Underpinnings of Neuromodulation following Spinal Cord Injury.

Soshi Samejima, Claire Shackleton, Tiev Miller, Chet T Moritz, Thomas M Kessler, Klaus Krogh, Rahul Sachdeva, Andrei V Krassioukov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. [Effects of spinal cord stimulation implantation on heart rate variability in patients with postherpetic neuralgia].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cardiovascular safety of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation in cervical spinal cord injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Soshi SamejimaInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3796-8085
Claire ShackletonInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Tiev MillerInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Chet T MoritzDepartments of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rehabilitation Medicine, and Physiology and Biophysics and the Center for Neurotechnology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Thomas M KesslerDepartment of Neuro-urology, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Klaus KroghDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Rahul SachdevaInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Andrei V KrassioukovInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord injury leads to disruption in autonomic control resulting in cardiovascular, bowel, and lower urinary tract dysfunctions, all of which significantly reduce health-related quality of life. Although spinal cord stimulation shows promise for promoting autonomic recovery, the underlying mechanisms are unclear. Based on current preclinical and clinical evidence, this narrative review provides the most plausible mechanisms underlying the effects of spinal cord stimulation for autonomic recovery, including activation of the somatoautonomic reflex and induction of neuroplastic changes in the spinal cord. Areas where evidence is limited are highlighted in an effort to guide the scientific community to further explore these mechanisms and advance the clinical translation of spinal cord stimulation for autonomic recovery.

Indexed as

Autonomic Nervous SystemRecovery of FunctionSpinal Cord InjuriesSpinal Cord StimulationAnimalsHumansNeuronal Plasticityautonomic functionbowel functioncardiovascular functionlower urinary tract functionspinal cord injuryspinal cord stimulation

Identifiers

PMID36631741
PMCPMC11107126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.