Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36631666›Full record

ReviewMedical & biological engineering & computing2023

Automated multi-beat tissue Doppler echocardiography analysis using deep neural networks.

Elisabeth S Lane, Jevgeni Jevsikov, Matthew J Shun-Shin, Niti Dhutia, Nasser Matoorian, Graham D Cole, Darrel P Francis, Massoud Zolgharni

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Sixty years in service to international biomedical engineering community.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elisabeth S LaneSchool of Computing and Engineering, University of West London, St Mary's Rd, Ealing, London, W5 5RF, UK. Elisabeth.Lane@uwl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7256-3668
Jevgeni JevsikovSchool of Computing and Engineering, University of West London, St Mary's Rd, Ealing, London, W5 5RF, UK.
Matthew J Shun-ShinNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK.
Niti DhutiaNew York University Abu Dhabi, Saadiyat Island, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Nasser MatoorianSchool of Computing and Engineering, University of West London, St Mary's Rd, Ealing, London, W5 5RF, UK.
Graham D ColeNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK.
Darrel P FrancisNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK.
Massoud ZolgharniSchool of Computing and Engineering, University of West London, St Mary's Rd, Ealing, London, W5 5RF, UK.

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/19/78/34733British Heart Foundation RG/F/22/110059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue Doppler imaging is an essential echocardiographic technique for the non-invasive assessment of myocardial blood velocity. Image acquisition and interpretation are performed by trained operators who visually localise landmarks representing Doppler peak velocities. Current clinical guidelines recommend averaging measurements over several heartbeats. However, this manual process is both time-consuming and disruptive to workflow. An automated system for accurate beat isolation and landmark identification would be highly desirable. A dataset of tissue Doppler images was annotated by three cardiologist experts, providing a gold standard and allowing for observer variability comparisons. Deep neural networks were trained for fully automated predictions on multiple heartbeats and tested on tissue Doppler strips of arbitrary length. Automated measurements of peak Doppler velocities show good Bland-Altman agreement (average standard deviation of 0.40 cm/s) with consensus expert values; less than the inter-observer variability (0.65 cm/s). Performance is akin to individual experts (standard deviation of 0.40 to 0.75 cm/s). Our approach allows for > 26 times as many heartbeats to be analysed, compared to a manual approach. The proposed automated models can accurately and reliably make measurements on tissue Doppler images spanning several heartbeats, with performance indistinguishable from that of human experts, but with significantly shorter processing time. HIGHLIGHTS: • Novel approach successfully identifies heartbeats from Tissue Doppler Images • Accurately measures peak velocities on several heartbeats • Framework is fast and can make predictions on arbitrary length images • Patient dataset and models made public for future benchmark studies.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsEchocardiography, DopplerEchocardiographyHumansMyocardiumNeural Networks, ComputerCardiac imagingDeep learningLandmark localisationObject detectionTissue Doppler echocardiography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.