Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36631511›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Modeling and affinity maturation of an anti-CD20 nanobody: a comprehensive in-silico investigation.

Alireza Poustforoosh, Sanaz Faramarz, Manica Negahdaripour, Hassan Hashemipour

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Affinity-stability trade-off mechanism of residue 35 in framework region 2 of VProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alireza PoustforooshDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran. alireza110_p@yahoo.com.
Sanaz FaramarzDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Afzalipour School of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Manica NegahdaripourDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, School of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Hassan HashemipourChemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Iran.
Kerman University of Medical Sciences · IRShahid Bahonar University of Kerman · IRShiraz University of Medical Sciences · IRVali Asr University of Rafsanjan · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

B-cell Non-Hodgkin lymphomas are the malignancies of lymphocytes. CD20 is a membrane protein, which is highly expressed on the cell surface of the B-cells in NHL. Treatments using monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have resulted in failure in some cases. Nanobodies (NBs), single-domain antibodies with low molecular weights and a high specificity in antigen recognition, could be practical alternatives for traditional mAbs with superior characteristics. To design an optimized NB as a candidate CD20 inhibitor with raised binding affinity to CD20, the structure of anti-CD20 NB was optimized to selectively target CD20. The 3D structure of the NB was constructed based on the optimal templates (6C5W and 5JQH), and the key residues were determined by applying a molecular docking study. After identifying the key residues, some mutations were introduced using a rational protocol to improve the binding affinity of the NB to CD20. The rational mutations were conducted using the experimental design (Taguchi method). Six residues (Ser27, Thr28, Phe29, Ile31, Asp99, and Asn100) were selected as the key residues, and five residues were targeted for rational mutation (Trp, Phe, His, Asp, and Tyr). Based on the mutations suggested by the experimental design, two optimized NB structures were constructed. NB2 showed a remarkable binding affinity to CD20 in docking studies with a binding energy of - 853 kcal/mol. The optimized NB was further evaluated using molecular dynamics simulation. The results revealed that CDR1 (complementarity determining regions1) and CDR3 are essential loops for recognizing the antigen. NB2 could be considered as a potential inhibitor of CD20, though experimental evaluations are needed to confirm it.

Indexed as

Antigens, CD20Single-Domain AntibodiesAntibodies, MonoclonalB-LymphocytesLymphoma, Non-HodgkinMolecular Docking SimulationAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, CD20Single-Domain Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID36631511
PMCPMC9834265
OpenAlexW4315588570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.