ArticleScientific reports2023
Development and psychometric evaluation of public stigma of stroke scale (PSSS).
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and psychometric evaluation of the Infertility Public Stigma Scale for Japanese women: protocol for an exploratory sequential mixed method study of the Japanese population.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Developing a Jordanian Measure of Reverence in Muslim Praying ('Khushoo'): Content Validity, Factor Structure and Reliability.Journal of religion and health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroke patients suffer from public stigma because strokes cause visible disability and heavy social burden. However, existing tools measuring stroke-related stigma do not consider public stigma. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a public stigma of stroke scale (PSSS). This cross-sectional study recruited 730 participants, aged above 18 years, with no diagnosis of stroke before. Scale items were generated after reviewing relevant literature and conducting interviews. An expert panel evaluated the validity and reliability of a preliminary scale. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), bifactor CFA (B-CFA), Exploratory structural equation modelling (ESEM), bifactor-ESEM (B-ESEM) were performed to extract factors and evaluate fit on the factor structures. The Omega coefficient was 0.93, and the test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.721. The EFA extracted four factors: inherent ideology, aesthetic feelings, avoidance behaviour, and policy attitudes. These explained 61.57% of the total variance in the data. The four-factor model was confirmed by B-CFA, and met the fitness criteria. The PSSS yields satisfactory psychometric properties and can be used to assess stroke-related public stigma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.