ArticleScientific reports2023
Reproducibility of cerebellar involvement as quantified by consensus structural MRI biomarkers in advanced essential tremor.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Condylar position-dependent cerebellar connectivity changes in painful temporomandibular disorder: a brief report.Head & face medicine · 2026Article
- Detailed Mapping of the Cerebellar Dentate Nucleus Using Ultra-High Field (7T) Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025Article
- Combined cortical thickness and blink reflex recovery cycle to differentiate essential tremor with and without resting tremor.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Vim-PSA Double-Target DBS for the Treatment of Holmes Tremor Secondary to Brainstem Hemorrhage: A Case Report.International medical case reports journal · 2024Article
- From Recognition to Remedy: The Significance of Biomarkers in Neurodegenerative Disease Pathology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Claim causality with clarity.Psychoradiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Essential tremor (ET) is the most prevalent movement disorder with poorly understood etiology. Some neuroimaging studies report cerebellar involvement whereas others do not. This discrepancy may stem from underpowered studies, differences in statistical modeling or variation in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition and processing. To resolve this, we investigated the cerebellar structural differences using a local advanced ET dataset augmented by matched controls from PPMI and ADNI. We tested the hypothesis of cerebellar involvement using three neuroimaging biomarkers: VBM, gray/white matter volumetry and lobular volumetry. Furthermore, we assessed the impacts of statistical models and segmentation pipelines on results. Results indicate that the detected cerebellar structural changes vary with methodology. Significant reduction of right cerebellar gray matter and increase of the left cerebellar white matter were the only two biomarkers consistently identified by multiple methods. Results also show substantial volumetric overestimation from SUIT-based segmentation-partially explaining previous literature discrepancies. This study suggests that current estimation of cerebellar involvement in ET may be overemphasized in MRI studies and highlights the importance of methods sensitivity analysis on results interpretation. ET datasets with large sample size and replication studies are required to improve our understanding of regional specificity of cerebellum involvement in ET. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: The stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report was accepted in principle on 21 March 2022. The protocol, as accepted by the journal, can be found at: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19697776 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.