Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36631460›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

The Stroop effect involves an excitatory-inhibitory fronto-cerebellar loop.

Moe Okayasu, Tensei Inukai, Daiki Tanaka, Kaho Tsumura, Reiko Shintaki, Masaki Takeda, Kiyoshi Nakahara, Koji Jimura

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cognitive control & the anterior cingulate cortex: Necessity & coherence.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Moe OkayasuDepartment of Biosciences and Informatics, Keio University, Yokohama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0478-6170
Tensei InukaiDepartment of Biosciences and Informatics, Keio University, Yokohama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6896-2965
Daiki TanakaDepartment of Biosciences and Informatics, Keio University, Yokohama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9385-0703
Kaho TsumuraDepartment of Biosciences and Informatics, Keio University, Yokohama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8398-3134
Reiko ShintakiDepartment of Biosciences and Informatics, Keio University, Yokohama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9837-9949
Masaki TakedaResearch Center for Brain Communication, Kochi University of Technology, Kami, Japan.
Kiyoshi NakaharaResearch Center for Brain Communication, Kochi University of Technology, Kami, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6701-6216
Koji JimuraDepartment of Biosciences and Informatics, Keio University, Yokohama, Japan. jimura@gunma-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-1991-3371
Keio University · JPKochi University of Technology · JPGunma University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Stroop effect is a classical, well-known behavioral phenomenon in humans that refers to robust interference between language and color information. It remains unclear, however, when the interference occurs and how it is resolved in the brain. Here we show that the Stroop effect occurs during perception of color-word stimuli and involves a cross-hemispheric, excitatory-inhibitory loop functionally connecting the lateral prefrontal cortex and cerebellum. Participants performed a Stroop task and a non-verbal control task (which we term the Swimmy task), and made a response vocally or manually. The Stroop effect involved the lateral prefrontal cortex in the left hemisphere and the cerebellum in the right hemisphere, independently of the response type; such lateralization was absent during the Swimmy task, however. Moreover, the prefrontal cortex amplified cerebellar activity, whereas the cerebellum suppressed prefrontal activity. This fronto-cerebellar loop may implement language and cognitive systems that enable goal-directed behavior during perceptual conflicts.

Indexed as

BrainPrefrontal CortexCerebellumHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingReaction TimeStroop Test

Identifiers

PMID36631460
PMCPMC9834394
OpenAlexW4315647614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.