Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36631267›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2023

A Cross-Species Neuroimaging Study of Sex Chromosome Dosage Effects on Human and Mouse Brain Anatomy.

Elisa Guma, Antoine Beauchamp, Siyuan Liu, Elizabeth Levitis, Liv S Clasen, Erin Torres, Jonathan Blumenthal, Francois Lalonde, Lily R Qiu, Haley Hrncir and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Sex differences research is important!Biology of sex differences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sex chromosomes and hormones independently influence healthy brain development but act similarly after cranial radiation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Elisa GumaSection on Developmental Neurogenomics, Human Genetics Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, 20892, Maryland elisa.guma@nih.gov raznahana@mail.nih.gov jason.lerch@ndcn.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4651-8529
Antoine BeauchampMouse Imaging Centre, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3H7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0008-7471
Siyuan LiuSection on Developmental Neurogenomics, Human Genetics Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, 20892, Maryland.
Elizabeth LevitisSection on Developmental Neurogenomics, Human Genetics Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, 20892, Maryland.
Liv S ClasenSection on Developmental Neurogenomics, Human Genetics Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, 20892, Maryland.
Erin TorresSection on Developmental Neurogenomics, Human Genetics Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, 20892, Maryland.
Jonathan BlumenthalSection on Developmental Neurogenomics, Human Genetics Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, 20892, Maryland.
Francois LalondeSection on Developmental Neurogenomics, Human Genetics Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, 20892, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-4945-0032
Lily R QiuMouse Imaging Centre, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3H7, Canada.
Haley HrncirDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095.
Allan MacKenzie-GrahamDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095.
Xia YangDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095.
Arthur P ArnoldDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095.
Jason P LerchMouse Imaging Centre, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3H7, Canada.
Armin RaznahanSection on Developmental Neurogenomics, Human Genetics Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, 20892, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-5622-1190
National Institute of Mental Health · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Toronto · CAHospital for Sick Children · CA

Funding

Section on Developmental NeurogenomicsZIAMH002949 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI RAZNAHAN, ARMIN · 2016 to 2025
$30.0M
Coupling neuroimaging with CLARITY and single cell genomics to dissect sex differences in the developing brainR01HD100298 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARNOLD, ARTHUR P, LERCH, JASON P. · 2020 to 2024
$2.2M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002949NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD100298
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All eutherian mammals show chromosomal sex determination with contrasting sex chromosome dosages (SCDs) between males (XY) and females (XX). Studies in transgenic mice and humans with sex chromosome trisomy (SCT) have revealed direct SCD effects on regional mammalian brain anatomy, but we lack a formal test for cross-species conservation of these effects. Here, we develop a harmonized framework for comparative structural neuroimaging and apply this to systematically profile SCD effects on regional brain anatomy in both humans and mice by contrasting groups with SCT (XXY and XYY) versus XY controls. Total brain size was substantially altered by SCT in humans (significantly decreased by XXY and increased by XYY), but not in mice. Robust and spatially convergent effects of XXY and XYY on regional brain volume were observed in humans, but not mice, when controlling for global volume differences. However, mice do show subtle effects of XXY and XYY on regional volume, although there is not a general spatial convergence in these effects within mice or between species. Notwithstanding this general lack of conservation in SCT effects, we detect several brain regions that show overlapping effects of XXY and XYY both within and between species (cerebellar, parietal, and orbitofrontal cortex), thereby nominating high priority targets for future translational dissection of SCD effects on the mammalian brain. Our study introduces a generalizable framework for comparative neuroimaging in humans and mice and applies this to achieve a cross-species comparison of SCD effects on the mammalian brain through the lens of SCT.

Indexed as

BrainSex ChromosomesAnimalsCerebellumFemaleHumansMaleMammalsMiceMice, TransgenicNeuroimagingcomparative neuroimagingcross-species homologymagnetic resonance imagingneuroanatomysex chromosome aneuploidysex chromosome trisomy

Identifiers

PMID36631267
PMCPMC9987571
OpenAlexW4315631739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.