ArticleBMJ open2023
Effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections on glycaemic control among older adults with type 2 diabetes: protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInsulin therapy plays an irreplaceable role in glycaemic control among older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and can be administered by either multiple daily injections (MDI) of insulin or by a continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) pump. Many clinical trials have compared the effects of CSII pumps and MDI in various diabetic populations, but there has been no systematic review and meta-analysis focusing on older adults with T2DM. This study aims to determine whether the CSII pump is associated with better glycaemic control relative to the MDI in older adults with T2DM. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science core collection, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang Database, Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP) and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (SinoMed) will be searched from inception to December 2021. Only randomised controlled trials will be included, and the language of the selected studies will be restricted to English and Chinese. Two researchers will independently screen the studies, extract data, assess the risk of bias and evaluate the quality of evidence. Any disagreement will be resolved by consensus or by a third researcher. Data analysis and synthesis will be conducted using RevMan V.5.3. Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis and publication bias assessment will be performed, as necessary. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As this study will not contain personal information, ethical approval will not be required. The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal or at relevant conference. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021283729.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.