Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36631025›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2022

Assessment of Inhaler Satisfaction and Determinants of High Satisfaction Among Korean COPD Patients.

Jong Geol Jang, Kwan Ho Lee, Jin Hong Chung, Kyeong-Cheol Shin, Eun Young Choi, Hyun Jung Jin, June Hong Ahn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Reliability and validity test and application of the Chinese version of the Feeling of Satisfaction with Inhaler.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Korean COPD Patients Can Get Satisfaction.Journal of Korean medical science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jong Geol JangDivision of Pulmonology and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University Medical Center, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8040-5363
Kwan Ho LeeDivision of Pulmonology and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University Medical Center, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6526-3333
Jin Hong ChungDivision of Pulmonology and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University Medical Center, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1829-3051
Kyeong-Cheol ShinDivision of Pulmonology and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University Medical Center, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1972-1847
Eun Young ChoiDivision of Pulmonology and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University Medical Center, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2974-5447
Hyun Jung JinDivision of Pulmonology and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University Medical Center, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2888-420X
June Hong AhnDivision of Pulmonology and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University Medical Center, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Korea. fireajh@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7104-8325
Yeungnam University Medical Center · KR

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2021M3E5D1A02015265National Research Foundation of Korea 2021R1C1C1009508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) recommend considering patient preference when choosing an inhaler device. However, few studies have assessed both inhaler satisfaction and factors associated with high inhaler satisfaction. Therefore, we assessed inhaler satisfaction and determinants of high satisfaction in Korean COPD patients.

methodsCOPD patients were prospectively enrolled from January 2018 to November 2019. The 308 inhalers used by the 261 participants in this study included dry powder inhalers (Turbuhaler, Breezhaler, Ellipta, Diskus, and Genuair), a soft mist inhaler (Respimat), and pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs). Inhaler satisfaction was assessed by the Feeling of Satisfaction with Inhaler (FSI-10) questionnaire. High inhaler satisfaction was defined as an FSI-10 ≥ 43.

resultsAmong 261 COPD patients, 163 (62.5%) were highly satisfied with their inhaler device. The rates of high inhaler satisfaction for Turbuhaler, Breezhaler, Ellipta, Diskus, Genuair, Respimat, and pMDI usage were 40.0%, 67.2%, 66.7%, 50.0%, 55.6%, 63.4%, and 45.0%, respectively (

conclusionHigh inhaler satisfaction was associated with dyspnea symptom and good inhaler adherence in COPD patients. Effective strategies are needed including appropriate inhaler device selection, consideration of patient preference, and repeated inhaler education to improve patient satisfaction of inhalers.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdministration, InhalationBronchodilator AgentsDry Powder InhalersEquipment DesignHumansNebulizers and VaporizersRepublic of KoreaBronchodilator AgentsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseDyspneaInhalerSatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID36631025
PMCPMC9705204
OpenAlexW4313129549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.