Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36630961›Full record

ArticleNeuron2023

The centrality of population-level factors to network computation is demonstrated by a versatile approach for training spiking networks.

Brian DePasquale, David Sussillo, L F Abbott, Mark M Churchland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Making models disagree to learn how brains compute.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Predictive pursuit emerges in high-dimensional recurrent neural networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Motor cortex flexibly deploys a high-dimensional repertoire of subskills.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. A neural manifold view of the brain.Nature neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Cortical sculpting of a rhythmic motor program.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Representation of a perceptual bias in the prefrontal cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  15. The Problem-Ladenness of Theory.Computational brain & behavior · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Motor Cortex Latent Dynamics Encode Spatial and Temporal Arm Movement Parameters Independently.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brian DePasqualePrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton NJ, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: bddepasq@bu.edu.
David SussilloDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
L F AbbottDepartment of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Department of Physiology and Cellular Biophysics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Kavli Institute for Brain Science, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Mark M ChurchlandDepartment of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Kavli Institute for Brain Science, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Grossman Center for the Statistics of Mind, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Modeling multi-area dynamics during motor controlU19NS104649 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI JESSELL, THOMAS M. · 2017 to 2021
$15.3M
Network Models for Timing and Sequence GenerationR01MH093338 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ABBOTT, LAURENCE F. · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH093338NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS104649
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural activity is often described in terms of population-level factors extracted from the responses of many neurons. Factors provide a lower-dimensional description with the aim of shedding light on network computations. Yet, mechanistically, computations are performed not by continuously valued factors but by interactions among neurons that spike discretely and variably. Models provide a means of bridging these levels of description. We developed a general method for training model networks of spiking neurons by leveraging factors extracted from either data or firing-rate-based networks. In addition to providing a useful model-building framework, this formalism illustrates how reliable and continuously valued factors can arise from seemingly stochastic spiking. Our framework establishes procedures for embedding this property in network models with different levels of realism. The relationship between spikes and factors in such networks provides a foundation for interpreting (and subtly redefining) commonly used quantities such as firing rates.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerNeuronsAction PotentialsModels, NeurologicalNerve Netartificial neural networksdimensionality reductiondynamical systemsfactor modelsFORCE learningmotor systemnetwork trainingpopulation dynamicsrecurrent neural networksspiking networks

Identifiers

PMID36630961
PMCPMC10118067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.