Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36630663›Full record

ArticleJCO oncology practice2023

Increasing Racial and Ethnic Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Cancer Treatment Trials: Evaluation of an ASCO-Association of Community Cancer Centers Site Self-Assessment.

Carmen Guerra, Alice Pressman, Patricia Hurley, Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer, Suanna S Bruinooge, Alexandra Howson, Melinda Kaltenbaugh, Jen Hanley Williams, Leigh Boehmer, Lea Ann Bernick and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO oncology practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Representation of race and ethnicity among cancer survivors in trials of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I): A systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Improving cancer clinical trial enrollment and patient understanding using TrialTalk, a structured communication method: a pilot randomized controlled trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Multiple Myeloma: A Call to Action.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Inequity in Cancer and Cancer Care Delivery in the United States.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Carmen GuerraUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0001-6349-9142
Alice PressmanSutter Health, Sacramento, CA.
Patricia HurleyAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA.ORCID 0000-0001-6898-7831
Elizabeth Garrett-MayerAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA.ORCID 0000-0003-4709-0333
Suanna S BruinoogeAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA.ORCID 0000-0002-9936-2719
Alexandra HowsonThistle Editorial LLC, Snoqualmie, WA.ORCID 0000-0002-1740-2925
Melinda KaltenbaughAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA.ORCID 0000-0002-1779-7146
Jen Hanley WilliamsAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA.ORCID 0000-0002-0875-7484
Leigh BoehmerAssociation of Community Cancer Centers, Rockville, MD.ORCID 0000-0001-8271-9905
Lea Ann BernickSutter Cancer Research Consortium, Novato, CA.
Leslie ByattUniversity of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM.
Marjory CharlotUniversity of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0000-0001-8773-0425
Jennie CrewsStanford University, Stanford, CA.
Lola Fashoyin-AjeFDA Oncology Center of Excellence, Silver Spring, MD.
Worta McCaskill-StevensNCI, Community Oncology and Prevention Trials Research Group, Bethesda, MD.
Janette MerrillAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA.ORCID 0000-0002-6304-1833
Greg NowakowskiMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID 0000-0002-6955-9393
Manali I PatelStanford Health Care, Palo Alto, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-9943-5762
Amelie RamirezUniversity of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-5310-1337
Victoria ZwickerAssociation of Community Cancer Centers, Rockville, MD.
Randall A OyerPenn Medicine Lancaster General Health, Lancaster, PA.ORCID 0000-0001-7554-4166
Lori J PierceUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
American Society of Clinical Oncology · USAssociation of Community Cancer Centers · USSutter Health · USAIDS Clinical Trials Group · USLancaster General Hospital · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USStanford Health Care · USStanford University · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of New Mexico · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical trial participants do not reflect the racial and ethnic diversity of people with cancer. ASCO and the Association of Community Cancer Centers collaborated on a quality improvement study to enhance racial and ethnic equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in cancer clinical trials. The groups conducted a pilot study to examine the feasibility, utility, and face validity of a two-part clinical trial site self-assessment to enable diverse types of research sites in the United States to (1) review internal data to assess racial and ethnic disparities in screening and enrollment and (2) review their policies, programs, procedures to identify opportunities and strategies to improve EDI. Overall, 81% of 62 participating sites were satisfied with the assessment; 82% identified opportunities for improvement; and 63% identified specific strategies and 74% thought the assessment had potential to help their site increase EDI. The assessment increased awareness about performance (82%) and helped identify specific strategies (63%) to increase EDI in trials. Although most sites (65%) were able to provide some data on the number of patients that consented, only two sites were able to provide all requested trial screening, offering, and enrollment data by race and ethnicity. Documenting and evaluating such data are critical steps toward improving EDI and are key to identifying and addressing disparities more broadly. ASCO and Association of Community Cancer Centers will partner with sites to better understand their processes and the feasibility of collecting screening, offering, and enrollment data in systematic and automated ways.

Indexed as

Diversity, Equity, InclusionNeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicEthnicityHumansPilot ProjectsSelf-AssessmentUnited States

Identifiers

PMID36630663
PMCPMC10101254
OpenAlexW4315631162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.