Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36630615›Full record

ArticleJournal of morphology2023

Assessment of the mechanical role of cranial sutures in the mammalian skull: Computational biomechanical modelling of the rat skull.

Alana C Sharp, Hugo Dutel, Peter J Watson, Flora Gröning, Nick Crumpton, Michael J Fagan, Susan E Evans

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of morphology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. ZooKeys · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alana C SharpDepartment of Musculoskeletal and Ageing Sciences, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5117-5335
Hugo DutelDepartment of Engineering, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Peter J WatsonDepartment of Engineering, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Flora GröningSchool of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Nick CrumptonDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London, UK.
Michael J FaganDepartment of Engineering, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Susan E EvansDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London, UK.
University of Hull · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H011668/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H011854/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M008061/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M008525/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M010287/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cranial sutures are fibrocellular joints between the skull bones that are progressively replaced with bone throughout ontogeny, facilitating growth and cranial shape change. This transition from soft tissue to bone is reflected in the biomechanical properties of the craniofacial complex. However, the mechanical significance of cranial sutures has only been explored at a few localised areas within the mammalian skull, and as such our understanding of suture function in overall skull biomechanics is still limited. Here, we sought to determine how the overall strain environment is affected by the complex network of cranial sutures in the mammal skull. We combined two computational biomechanical methods, multibody dynamics analysis and finite element analysis, to simulate biting in a rat skull and compared models with and without cranial sutures. Our results show that including complex sutures in the rat model does not substantially change overall strain gradients across the cranium, particularly strain magnitudes in the bones overlying the brain. However, local variations in strain magnitudes and patterns can be observed in areas close to the sutures. These results show that, during feeding, sutures may be more important in some regions than others. Sutures should therefore be included in models that require accurate local strain magnitudes and patterns of cranial strain, particularly if models are developed for analysis of specific regions, such as the temporomandibular joint or zygomatic arch. Our results suggest that, for mammalian skulls, cranial sutures might be more important for allowing brain expansion during growth than redistributing biting loads across the cranium in adults.

Indexed as

Cranial SuturesSkullAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaHeadMammalsRatsStress, Mechanicalcranial suturescraniofacialfeedingfinite element analysismultibody dynamic analysisrodent

Identifiers

PMID36630615
PMCPMC10107956
OpenAlexW4315753270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.