Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36630501›Full record

ArticleScience advances2023

Experience-dependent plasticity of gustatory insular cortex circuits and taste preferences.

Hillary C Schiff, Joshua F Kogan, Maria Isaac, Lindsey A Czarnecki, Alfredo Fontanini, Arianna Maffei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Insular cortex predictions regulate glucose homeostasis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Critical Periods and Beyond: Dynamic Functions of Perineuronal Nets in Cognition, Development, and Disease.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hillary C SchiffDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1147-2399
Joshua F KoganDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1418-2135
Maria IsaacDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7502-7190
Lindsey A CzarneckiDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2735-6456
Alfredo FontaniniDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Arianna MaffeiDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6755-8904
Stony Brook School · USStony Brook University · US

Funding

Synaptic organization and plasticity of the input from the basolateral amygdala tR01DC013770 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI Alfredo Fontanini, Arianna Maffei · 2014 to 2026
$4.6M
Metastable dynamics in cortical circuitsUF1NS115779 · NINDS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI BRINKMAN, BRADEN, FONTANINI, ALFREDO · 2020 to 2020
$3.6M
Cortical mechanisms for the postnatal development of taste preference.R01DC019827 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI MAFFEI, ARIANNA · 2021 to 2025
$2.4M
Gustatory cortex and reward-based, taste-action associationsR01DC018227 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI FONTANINI, ALFREDO · 2019 to 2023
$2.2M
Laminar differences in taste coding: a circuit perspectiveR01DC015234 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI FONTANINI, ALFREDO, MAFFEI, ARIANNA · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
Maturation of inhibitory circuits in the gustatory cortex and expression of taste preferenceF32DC018485 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI SCHIFF, HILLARY C · 2020 to 2022
$232k
The role of gustatory cortex in perceptual learning of tasteF30DC019523 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI KOGAN, JOSHUA · 2021 to 2024
$184k
NIDCD NIH HHS F30 DC019523NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC018485NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013770NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015234NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018227NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC019827NINDS NIH HHS UF1 NS115779
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early experience with food influences taste preference in adulthood. How gustatory experience influences development of taste preferences and refinement of cortical circuits has not been investigated. Here, we exposed weanling mice to an array of taste solutions and determined the effects on the preference for sweet in adulthood. We demonstrate an experience-dependent shift in sucrose preference persisting several weeks following the termination of exposure. A shift in sucrose palatability, altered neural responsiveness to sucrose, and inhibitory synaptic plasticity in the gustatory portion of the insular cortex (GC) were also induced. The modulation of sweet preference occurred within a restricted developmental window, but restoration of the capacity for inhibitory plasticity in adult GC reactivated the sensitivity of sucrose preference to taste experience. Our results establish a fundamental link between gustatory experience, sweet preference, inhibitory plasticity, and cortical circuit function and highlight the importance of early life nutrition in setting taste preferences.

Indexed as

Insular CortexTasteAnimalsCerebral CortexFoodMiceSucroseTaste PerceptionSucrose

Identifiers

PMID36630501
PMCPMC9833665
OpenAlexW4315631458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.