Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36630475›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Tephrosia toxicaria (Sw.) Pers. extracts: Screening by examining aedicidal action under laboratory and field conditions along with its antioxidant, antileishmanial, and antimicrobial activities.

Giulian César da Silva Sá, Leidiane Barboza da Silva, Pedro Vitor Vale Bezerra, Melissa Alves Farias da Silva, Cássio Lázaro Silva Inacio, Weslley de Souza Paiva, Virgínia Penéllope Macedo E Silva, Laísa Vilar Cordeiro, Johny Wysllas de Freitas Oliveira, Marcelo Sousa Silva and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Glyphosate Bioremediation Facilitated byJournal of xenobiotics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Giulian César da Silva SáDepartment of Cellular Biology and Genetics, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Leidiane Barboza da SilvaDepartment of Cellular Biology and Genetics, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Pedro Vitor Vale BezerraDepartment of Cellular Biology and Genetics, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Melissa Alves Farias da SilvaDepartment of Cellular Biology and Genetics, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Cássio Lázaro Silva InacioDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, Laboratory of Entomology Research, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1666-6646
Weslley de Souza PaivaDepartment of Biochemistry, Laboratory of Biotechnology of Natural Polymer, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Virgínia Penéllope Macedo E SilvaDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, Laboratory of Entomology Research, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Laísa Vilar CordeiroDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Laboratory of Mycology, Universidade Federal da Paraiba, João Pessoa, Paraiba, Brazil.
Johny Wysllas de Freitas OliveiraDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analysis, Laboratory of Immunoparasitology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3100-0420
Marcelo Sousa SilvaDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analysis, Laboratory of Immunoparasitology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Edeltrudes de Oliveira LimaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Laboratory of Mycology, Universidade Federal da Paraiba, João Pessoa, Paraiba, Brazil.
Francisco José Carvalho MoreiraLaboratory of Seeds Plant Health, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Ceará, Sobral, Ceará, Brazil.
Hugo Alexandre de Oliveira RochaDepartment of Biochemistry, Laboratory of Biotechnology of Natural Polymer, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Patricia Batista BarraDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte, Mossoró, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Maria de Fátima Freire de Melo XimenesDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, Laboratory of Entomology Research, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7173-5416
Adriana Ferreira UchôaDepartment of Cellular Biology and Genetics, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3822-6502
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BRInstituto Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BRUniversidade Federal da Paraíba · BRInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Ceará · BRUniversidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increase in the incidence of arboviral, microbial and parasitic infections, and to disorders related to oxidative stress has encouraged the development of adjuvant therapies based on natural formulations, such as those involving plant extracts. Thus, to expand the repertoire of the available therapeutic options, this study aimed to describe the versatility of Tephrosia toxicaria (Sw.) (Pers., 1807) extracts for the control of arbovirus vectors, as well as their antioxidant, antileishmanial, and antimicrobial potential. Among the aqueous and hydroethanolic extracts obtained, the hydroethanolic extract from roots (RHA) was identified as the most active larvicide extract demonstrating, respectively, the lowest lethal concentration (mg/mL) for 50%, 90% and 99% of Aedes aegypti (L., 1762) and Aedes albopictus (S., 1894) larvae, observed at 24 h (0.33, 0.84 and 1.80; 0.32, 0.70 and 1.32) and 48 h (0.17, 0.51 and 1.22; 0.26, 0.47 and 0.78) post-exposure. Field assays revealed that RHA (0.84 mg/mL) is a potential oviposition deterrent, reducing egg-laying by approximately 90%. RHA (0.1 mg/mL) also exhibited antioxidant activity for the following tests: total antioxidant capacity (286.86 mg AAE/g), iron (87.16%) and copper (25.64%) chelation, and superoxide scavenging (10%). In the cell culture assays, RHA (0.1 mg/mL) promoted regeneration of metabolic activity (92% cell viability) in cells exposed to oxidative stress. Furthermore, RHA displayed weak antileishmanial activity (IC50 = 3.53 mg/mL) against Leishmania amazonensis and not exhibit antimicrobial activity. The extraction favored the concentration of carbohydrates in RHA, in addition to lectins and protease inhibitors, with molecular masses estimated between 10 and 24 kDa. Cytotoxicity and phytotoxicity analyses of RHA suggested its biosecurity. Thus, RHA is a multivalent extract with insecticide and antioxidant properties at low and safe concentrations. However, others studies on its indirect toxic effects are ongoing to ensure the complete safety of RHA.

Indexed as

AedesAnti-Infective AgentsAntiprotozoal AgentsTephrosiaAnimalsAntioxidantsFemaleMosquito VectorsPlant ExtractsAnti-Infective AgentsAntioxidantsAntiprotozoal AgentsPlant Extracts

Identifiers

PMID36630475
PMCPMC9833590
OpenAlexW4315620583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.