Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36630468›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Pandemic news information uncertainty-News dynamics mirror differential response strategies to COVID-19.

Kristoffer Nielbo, Kenneth Enevoldsen, Rebekah Baglini, Elena Fano, Andreas Roepstorff, Jianbo Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kristoffer NielboCenter for Humanities Computing Aarhus, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5116-5070
Kenneth EnevoldsenCenter for Humanities Computing Aarhus, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Rebekah BagliniCenter for Humanities Computing Aarhus, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2836-5867
Elena FanoNational Library of Sweden, Stockholm, Sweden.
Andreas RoepstorffInteracting Minds Centre, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jianbo GaoCenter for Geodata and Analysis, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

National differences in uncertainty, inequality, and trust have been accentuated by COVID-19. There are indications that the pandemic has impacted societies characterized by high uncertainty, inequality, and low trust harder than societies characterized by low uncertainty, equality, and high trust. This study investigates differential response strategies to COVID-19 as reflected in news media of two otherwise similar low uncertainty societies: Denmark and Sweden. The comparison is made using a recent approach to information dynamics in unstructured data. The main findings are that the news dynamics generally mirror public-health policies, capture fundamental socio-cultural variables related to uncertainty and trust, and may provide a measure of societal uncertainty. The findings can provide insights into evolutionary trajectories of decision-making under high uncertainty and, from a methodological level, be used to develop a media-based index of uncertainty and trust.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansMass MediaPandemicsTrustUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID36630468
PMCPMC9833533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.