Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36630326›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Advertising expenditures on child-targeted food and beverage products in two policy environments in Canada in 2016 and 2019.

Monique Potvin Kent, Elise Pauzé, Lauren Remedios, David Wu, Julia Soares Guimaraes, Adena Pinto, Mariangela Bagnato, Meghan Pritchard, Mary L'Abbé, Christine Mulligan and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Monique Potvin KentSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5049-1106
Elise PauzéSchool of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Lauren RemediosSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
David WuSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, Ontario, Canada.
Julia Soares GuimaraesSchool of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Adena PintoSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Mariangela BagnatoSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Meghan PritchardSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Mary L'AbbéDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Christine MulliganDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Laura VergeerDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Madyson WeippertDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe food industry advertises unhealthy foods intended for children which in turn fosters poor diets. This study characterized advertising expenditures on child-targeted products in Canada and compared these expenditures between Quebec, where commercial advertising to children under 13 is restricted, and the rest of Canada, where food advertising to children is self-regulated.

methodsAdvertising expenditures data for 2016 and 2019 for 57 select food categories and five media channels were licensed from Numerator. Products and brands targeted to children were identified based on their nature and the advertising techniques used to promote them. Advertising expenditures were classified as healthy/unhealthy using Health Canada's nutrient profile model. Expenditures per child capita aged 2-12 years were calculated and expenditures from 2016 were adjusted for inflation. Advertising expenditures were described by media, food category, year, and geographic region.

resultsOverall, $57.2 million CAD was spent advertising child-targeted products in Canada in 2019. Television accounted for 77% of expenditures followed by digital media (18%), and the food categories with the highest expenditures were candy/chocolate (30%) and restaurants (16%). The totality of expenditures (99.9%-100%) in both Quebec and the rest of Canada in 2016 and 2019 were considered 'unhealthy'. Across all media channels (excluding digital), advertising expenditures were 9% lower in 2019 versus 2016. Advertising expenditures per capita were 32% lower in Quebec ($9.40/capita) compared to the rest of the country ($13.91/capita).

conclusionIn Canada, millions are spent promoting child-targeted products considered inappropriate for advertising to children. While per capita advertising expenditures for these products are lower in Quebec compared to the rest of Canada, they remain high, suggesting that Quebec's commercial advertising restrictions directed to children are likely not sufficiently protecting them from unhealthy food advertising.

Indexed as

AdvertisingHealth ExpendituresBeveragesCanadaFoodFood IndustryHumansInternetPolicyTelevision

Identifiers

PMID36630326
PMCPMC9833551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.