ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2023
Lymph node detection in CT scans using modified U-Net with residual learning and 3D deep network.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automated segmentation of lymph node metastases in colorectal cancer based on convolutional KAN.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Deep learning for malignant lymph node segmentation and detection: a review.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- 3D-printed hip prostheses with regenerative integration: a state-of-the-art comprehensive review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Automated Segmentation of Lymph Nodes on Neck CT Scans Using Deep Learning.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- DraiNet: AI-driven decision support in pneumothorax and pleural effusion management.Pediatric surgery international · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeLymph node (LN) detection is a crucial step that complements the diagnosis and treatments involved during cancer investigations. However, the low-contrast structures in the CT scan images and the nodes' varied shapes, sizes, and poses, along with their sparsely distributed locations, make the detection step challenging and lead to many false positives. The manual examination of the CT scan slices could be time-consuming, and false positives could divert the clinician's focus. To overcome these issues, our work aims at providing an automated framework for LNs detection in order to obtain more accurate detection results with low false positives.
methodsThe proposed work consists of two stages: candidate generation and false positive reduction. The first stage generates volumes of interest (VOI) of probable LN candidates using a modified U-Net with ResNet architecture to obtain high sensitivity but with the cost of increased false positives. The second-stage processes the obtained candidate LNs for false positive reduction using 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) classifier. We further present an analysis of various deep learning models while decomposing 3D VOI into different representations.
resultsThe method is evaluated on two publicly available datasets containing CT scans of mediastinal and abdominal LNs. Our proposed approach yields sensitivities of 87% at 2.75 false positives per volume (FP/vol.) and 79% at 1.74 FP/vol. with the mediastinal and abdominal datasets, respectively. Our method presented a competitive performance in terms of sensitivity compared to the state-of-the-art methods and encountered very few false positives.
conclusionWe developed an automated framework for LNs detection using a modified U-Net with residual learning and 3D CNNs. The results indicate that our method could achieve high sensitivity with relatively low false positives, which helps avoid ineffective treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.