Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36630071›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2023

Lymph node detection in CT scans using modified U-Net with residual learning and 3D deep network.

Yashwanth Manjunatha, Vanshali Sharma, Yuji Iwahori, M K Bhuyan, Aili Wang, Akira Ouchi, Yasuhiro Shimizu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Automated Segmentation of Lymph Nodes on Neck CT Scans Using Deep Learning.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Yashwanth ManjunathaDept. of Electronics & Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, 781039, India.
Vanshali SharmaDept. of Computer Science & Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, 781039, India. vanshalisharma@iitg.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0008-1579
Yuji IwahoriDept. of Computer Science, Chubu University, Kasugai, 487-8501, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6421-8186
M K BhuyanDept. of Electronics & Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, 781039, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2152-5466
Aili WangHigher Educational Key Laboratory for Measuring and Control Technology and Instrumentations of Heilongjiang, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, 150080, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9118-230X
Akira OuchiDept. of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, 464-8681, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0435-5370
Yasuhiro ShimizuDept. of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, 464-8681, Japan.
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati · INAichi Cancer Center · JPChubu University · JPHarbin University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) 20K11873
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLymph node (LN) detection is a crucial step that complements the diagnosis and treatments involved during cancer investigations. However, the low-contrast structures in the CT scan images and the nodes' varied shapes, sizes, and poses, along with their sparsely distributed locations, make the detection step challenging and lead to many false positives. The manual examination of the CT scan slices could be time-consuming, and false positives could divert the clinician's focus. To overcome these issues, our work aims at providing an automated framework for LNs detection in order to obtain more accurate detection results with low false positives.

methodsThe proposed work consists of two stages: candidate generation and false positive reduction. The first stage generates volumes of interest (VOI) of probable LN candidates using a modified U-Net with ResNet architecture to obtain high sensitivity but with the cost of increased false positives. The second-stage processes the obtained candidate LNs for false positive reduction using 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) classifier. We further present an analysis of various deep learning models while decomposing 3D VOI into different representations.

resultsThe method is evaluated on two publicly available datasets containing CT scans of mediastinal and abdominal LNs. Our proposed approach yields sensitivities of 87% at 2.75 false positives per volume (FP/vol.) and 79% at 1.74 FP/vol. with the mediastinal and abdominal datasets, respectively. Our method presented a competitive performance in terms of sensitivity compared to the state-of-the-art methods and encountered very few false positives.

conclusionWe developed an automated framework for LNs detection using a modified U-Net with residual learning and 3D CNNs. The results indicate that our method could achieve high sensitivity with relatively low false positives, which helps avoid ineffective treatments.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansLymph NodesMediastinumNeural Networks, Computer3D networksCancer stagingLymph node detectionLymph node segmentation

Identifiers

PMID36630071
OpenAlexW4315620787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.