Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36630004›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2023

Driving time drives the hospital choice: choice models for pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Italy.

Amerigo Ferrari, Chiara Seghieri, Andrea Giannini, Paolo Mannella, Tommaso Simoncini, Milena Vainieri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amerigo FerrariInstitute of Management, MeS (Management and Health) Laboratory, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Via San Zeno 2, 56127, Pisa, Italy. amerigo.ferrari@santannapisa.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5309-2813
Chiara SeghieriInstitute of Management, MeS (Management and Health) Laboratory, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Via San Zeno 2, 56127, Pisa, Italy.
Andrea GianniniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy.
Paolo MannellaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy.
Tommaso SimonciniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy.
Milena VainieriInstitute of Management, MeS (Management and Health) Laboratory, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Via San Zeno 2, 56127, Pisa, Italy.

Funding

Regione Toscana No Award Number
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Italian healthcare jurisdiction promotes patient mobility, which is a major determinant of practice variation, thus being related to the equity of access to health services. We aimed to explore how travel times, waiting times, and other efficiency- and quality-related hospital attributes influenced the hospital choice of women needing pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery in Tuscany, Italy.

methodsWe obtained the study population from Hospital Discharge Records. We duplicated individual observations (n = 2533) for the number of Tuscan hospitals that provided more than 30 POP interventions from 2017 to 2019 (n = 22) and merged them with the hospitals' list. We generated the dichotomous variable "hospital choice" assuming the value one when hospitals where patients underwent surgery coincided with one of the 22 hospitals. We performed mixed logit models to explore between-hospital patient choice, gradually adding the women's features as interactions.

resultsPatient choice was influenced by travel more than waiting times. A general preference for hospitals delivering higher volumes of interventions emerged. Interaction analyses showed that poorly educated women were less likely to choose distant hospitals and hospitals providing greater volumes of interventions compared to their counterpart. Women with multiple comorbidities more frequently chose hospitals with shorter average length of stay.

conclusionTravel times were the main determinants of hospital choice. Other quality- and efficiency-related hospital attributes influenced hospital choice as well. However, the effect depended on the socioeconomic and clinical background of women. Managers and policymakers should consider these findings to understand how women behave in choosing providers and thus mitigate equity gaps.

Indexed as

HospitalsPelvic Organ ProlapseDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth ServicesHumansLogistic ModelsDiscrete choice analysisGynecological surgeryHospital choiceMixed logit modelPatient mobilityPelvic organ prolapse

Identifiers

PMID36630004
PMCPMC9833017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.