Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36630001›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2023

Assessing the learning curve of robot-assisted total mesorectal excision: a multicenter study considering procedural safety, pathological safety, and efficiency.

T A Burghgraef, D J Sikkenk, R M P H Crolla, M Fahim, J Melenhorst, M El Moumni, G van der Schelling, A B Smits, L P S Stassen, P M Verheijen and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. [Robotic rectal surgery].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  20. Long-Term Outcomes of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excisions: A Propensity-Score Matched Cohort study of 5-year survival outcomes.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

T A BurghgraefDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. t.a.burghgraef@umcg.nl.
D J SikkenkDepartment of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
R M P H CrollaDepartment of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
M FahimDepartment of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
J MelenhorstDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
M El MoumniDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
G van der SchellingDepartment of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
A B SmitsDepartment of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
L P S StassenDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
P M VerheijenDepartment of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
E C J ConstenDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Meander Medisch Centrum · NLAmphia Ziekenhuis · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEvidence regarding the learning curve of robot-assisted total mesorectal excision is scarce and of low quality. Case-mix is mostly not taken into account, and learning curves are based on operative time, while preferably clinical outcomes and literature-based limits should be used. Therefore, this study aims to assess the learning curve of robot-assisted total mesorectal excision.

methodsA retrospective study was performed in four Dutch centers. The primary aim was to assess the safety of the individual and institutional learning curves using a RA-CUSUM analysis based on intraoperative complications, major postoperative complications, and compound pathological outcome (positive circumferential margin or incomplete TME specimen). The learning curve for efficiency was assessed using a LC-CUSUM analysis for operative time. Outcomes of patients before and after the learning curve were compared.

resultsIn this study, seven participating surgeons performed robot-assisted total mesorectal excisions in 531 patients. Learning curves for intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, and compound pathological outcome did not exceed predefined literature-based limits. The LC-CUSUM for operative time showed lengths of the learning curve ranging from 12 to 35 cases. Intraoperative, postoperative, and pathological outcomes did not differ between patients operated during and after the learning curve.

conclusionThe learning curve of robot-assisted total mesorectal excision based on intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, and compound pathological outcome did not exceed predefined limits and is therefore suggested to be safe. Using operative time as a surrogate for efficiency, the learning curve is estimated to be between 12 and 35 procedures.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRectal NeoplasmsRoboticsHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsLearning CurveMargins of ExcisionPostoperative ComplicationsRectumRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeLearning curveRectal cancerRobot-assisted surgeryTotal mesorectal excision

Identifiers

PMID36630001
PMCPMC9834356
OpenAlexW4315498944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.