ArticleJournal of digital imaging2023
Using Deep Learning to Predict Treatment Response in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Y90 Radiation Segmentectomy.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Machine learning models classifiers enable a strong prediction of radioembolization-induced liver disease, and define a new bilirubin threshold for selection of patients.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Imaging-Based Artificial Intelligence in Vascular and Interventional Radiology: A Narrative Review.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
- Emerging Role of MRI-Based Artificial Intelligence in Individualized Treatment Strategies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Narrative Review.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Review
- Optimizing Yttrium-90 Radioembolization Dosimetry for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Korean Perspective.Korean journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma response to radiation segmentectomy using an MRI-based machine learning approach.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Vascular liver segmentation: a narrative review on methods and new insights brought by artificial intelligence.The Journal of international medical research · 2024Review
- New frontiers in radioembolization.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024Review
- Imaging in Interventional Radiology: 2043 and Beyond.Radiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with Y90 radioembolization segmentectomy (Y90-RE) demonstrates a tumor dose-response threshold, where dose estimates are highly dependent on accurate SPECT/CT acquisition, registration, and reconstruction. Any error can result in distorted absorbed dose distributions and inaccurate estimates of treatment success. This study improves upon the voxel-based dosimetry model, one of the most accurate methods available clinically, by using a deep convolutional network ensemble to account for the spatially variable uptake of Y90 within a treated lesion. A retrospective analysis was conducted in patients with HCC who received Y90-RE at a single institution. Seventy-seven patients with 103 lesions met the inclusion criteria: three or fewer tumors, pre- and post treatment MRI, and no prior Y90-RE. Lesions were labeled as complete (n = 57) or incomplete response (n = 46) based on 3-month post treatment MRI and divided by medical record number into a 20% hold-out test set and 80% training set with 5-fold cross-validation. Slice-wise predictions were made from an average ensemble of models and thresholds from the highest accuracy epochs across all five folds. Lesion predictions were made by thresholding all slice predictions through the lesion. When compared to the voxel-based dosimetry model, our model had a higher F1-score (0.72 vs. 0.2), higher accuracy (0.65 vs. 0.60), and higher sensitivity (1.0 vs. 0.11) at predicting complete treatment response. This algorithm has the potential to identify patients with treatment failure who may benefit from earlier follow-up or additional treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.