ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2023
Machine learning model successfully identifies important clinical features for predicting outpatients with rotator cuff tears.
Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- The bioinductive collagen implant yields positive histological, clinical and MRI outcomes in the management of rotator cuff tears: A systematic review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Pooled it
- The implementation of artificial intelligence in upper extremity surgery: a systematic review.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Pooled it
- A machine learning approach to predict treatment response in myofascial pain patients receiving masseter trigger point injections.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Article
- Toward Personalized Rotator Cuff Physical Therapy Dosage Using a Machine Learning-Based Pilot Study with EMG.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multimodal deep learning integrating ultrasonographic and clinical data for enhanced rotator cuff tear identification.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence models cannot yet replace experts in providing patient education for shoulder and elbow orthopaedic pathologies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of joint · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in shoulder and elbow surgery: a bibliometric analysis of affiliation-based collaboration patterns.JSES international · 2026Review
- Explainable machine learning to predict prolonged post-operative opioid use in rotator cuff patients.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Update of a prediction model for postoperative shoulder stiffness after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- An overview of artificial intelligence and machine learning in shoulder surgery.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2025Article
- Machine-learning models for shoulder rehabilitation exercises classification using a wearable system.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Article
- Methodology and development of a machine learning probability calculator: Data heterogeneity limits ability to predict recurrence after arthroscopic Bankart repair.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence applications in the management of musculoskeletal disorders of the shoulder: A systematic review.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
- Scapula dyskinesis in medium-sized full-thickness rotator cuff tear after subacromial Lidocaine infiltration and rotator cuff reconstruction.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in medical and biological research: promise and perils of ChatGPT and DeepSeek in advancing healthcare.Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2025Review
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Shoulder Pathology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Using machine learning techniques to predict the risk of osteoporosis based on nationwide chronic disease data.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Identifying Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Adults with Explainable Artificial Intelligence.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2023Article
- Current clinical applications of artificial intelligence in shoulder surgery: what the busy shoulder surgeon needs to know and what's coming next.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study is to develop a machine learning model to identify important clinical features related to rotator cuff tears (RCTs) using explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) for efficiently predicting outpatients with RCTs.
methodsA retrospective review of a local clinical registry dataset was performed to include patients with shoulder pain and dysfunction who underwent questionnaires and physical examinations between 2019 and 2022. RCTs were diagnosed by shoulder arthroscopy. Six machine-learning algorithms (Stacking, Gradient Boosting Machine, Bagging, Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boost (XGBoost), and Adaptive Boosting) were developed for the prediction. The performance of the models was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Brier scores, and Decision curve. The interpretability of the predicted outcomes was evaluated using Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) values.
resultsA total of 1684 patients who completed questionnaires and clinical tests were included, and 417 patients with RCTs underwent shoulder arthroscopy. In six machining learning algorithms for predicting RCTs, the accuracy, AUC values, and Brier scores were in the range of 0.81-0.86, 0.75-0.92, and 0.15-0.19, respectively. The XGBoost model showed superior performance with accuracy, AUC, and Brier scores of 0.85(95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.87), 0.92 (95% confidence interval,0.90-0.94), and 0.15 (95% confidence interval,0.14-0.16), respectively. The Shapley plot showed the impact of the clinical features on predicting RCTs. The most important variables were Jobe test, Bear hug test, and age for prediction, with mean SHAP values of 1.458, 0.950, and 0.790, respectively.
conclusionThe machine learning model successfully identified important clinical variables for predicting patients with RCTs. In addition, the best algorithm was also integrated into a digital application to provide predictions in outpatient settings. This tool may assist patients in reducing their pain experience and providing prompt treatments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.