Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36629480›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2023

Assessment of the mode of action underlying development of liver lesions in mice following oral exposure to HFPO-DA and relevance to humans.

Melissa M Heintz, Laurie C Haws, James E Klaunig, John M Cullen, Chad M Thompson

Open access · hybridFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Integration of mechanistic and repeat dose toxicity data in the derivation of an oral reference dose for HFPO-DA.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa M HeintzToxStrategies, LLC, Asheville, North Carolina 28801, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8931-617X
Laurie C HawsToxStrategies, LLC, Austin, Texas 78759, USA.
James E KlaunigSchool of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA.
John M CullenNorth Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606, USA.
Chad M ThompsonToxStrategies, LLC, Katy, Texas 77494, USA.
BioStrategies (United States) · USIndiana University Bloomington · USNorth Carolina State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HFPO-DA (ammonium, 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoro-2-(heptafluoropropoxy)propanoate) is a short-chain polyfluorinated alkyl substance (PFAS) used in the manufacture of some types of fluorinated polymers. Like many PFAS, toxicity studies with HFPO-DA indicate the liver is the primary target of toxicity in rodents following oral exposure. Due to the structural diversity of PFAS, the mode of action (MOA) can differ between PFAS for the same target tissue. There is significant evidence for involvement of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) activation based on molecular and histopathological responses in the liver following HFPO-DA exposure, but other MOAs have also been hypothesized based on limited evidence. The MOA underlying the liver effects in mice exposed to HFPO-DA was assessed in the context of the Key Events (KEs) outlined in the MOA framework for PPARα activator-induced rodent hepatocarcinogenesis. The first 3 KEs (ie, PPARα activation, alteration of cell growth pathways, and perturbation of cell growth/survival) are supported by several lines of evidence from both in vitro and in vivo data available for HFPO-DA. In contrast, alternate MOAs, including cytotoxicity, PPARγ and mitochondrial dysfunction are generally not supported by the scientific literature. HFPO-DA-mediated liver effects in mice are not expected in humans as only KE 1, PPARα activation, is shared across species. PPARα-mediated gene expression in humans produces only a subset (ie, lipid modulating effects) of the responses observed in rodents. As such, the adverse effects observed in rodent livers should not be used as the basis of toxicity values for HFPO-DA for purposes of human health risk assessment.

Indexed as

FluorocarbonsLiver NeoplasmsAnimalsHumansLiverMicePPAR alphaPropionatesRodentiaammonium 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoro-2-(heptafluoropropoxy)-propanoateFluorocarbonsPPAR alphaPropionatesHFPO-DA (GenX)livermode of action (MOA)peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor αPFAS(PPARα)

Identifiers

PMID36629480
PMCPMC10025879
OpenAlexW4315588583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read104
measurements read59
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.