ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2023
Clinicoradiologic data of familial cerebral cavernous malformation with age-related disease burden.
Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unraveling Etiological Indications and Therapeutic Implications of Familial Cerebral Cavernous Malformations in the Dawn of Gene Therapy for Monogenic Conditions.Current gene therapy · 2025Article
- Prevalence, genetic and clinical characteristics in first-degree relatives of patients with familial cerebral cavernous malformations in China.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveFamilial cerebral cavernous malformation (FCCM) is an autosomal dominant disease induced by loss-of-function mutations in three CCM genes, KRIT1, CCM2, and PDCD10. However, previous studies paid little attention to analyzing the radiologic features and age-related disease burden according to the genes. Therefore, we retrospectively reviewed the genetic tests of our center's clinical FCCM patients.
methodThis study investigated clinical FCCM patients with multiple lesions or a family history of CCMs who underwent the FCCM gene (KRTI1, CCM2, and PDCD10) panel test. The clinical, genetic, and radiologic features were analyzed.
resultAmong the patients (n = 34) undergoing the FCCM gene test, twenty-seven patients had CCM confirmed by brain MRI, and twenty-one patients were considered to have FCCM (cohort 1). In cohort 1, thirteen patients had mutations in the FCCM gene, but eight did not. Cohort 2 comprised cohort 1 and four family members with the same mutation as the probands. Six novel variants in CCM genes were detected (KRIT1 c.22_26del, c.815dup, c.1094_1098del, c.1147-2A>G, c.2124dup, and PDCD10 c.150 + 1dup). Cohort 1 demonstrated that brainstem lesions were mostly associated with the mutation detection in CCM genes (brainstem, lateral temporal, and parietal lesions vs. lateral temporal and parietal lesions, AUC 0.928 vs. 0.779, P = 0.0389). The radiologic severity worsened according to age in the KRIT1 group compared with the Mutation not detected group (correlation coefficient 0.75 (P < 0.001) versus 0.53 (P = 0.004)).
conclusionThe brainstem lesion could be the radiologic marker for FCCM with the mutation detected. The age-related disease burden regarding FCCM according to genetic information was demonstrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.