Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36629266›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2023

Hypothesis-driven probabilistic modelling enables a principled perspective of genomic compartments.

Hagai Kariti, Tal Feld, Noam Kaplan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hagai KaritiDepartment of Physiology, Biophysics & Systems Biology, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-9645-6963
Tal FeldDepartment of Physiology, Biophysics & Systems Biology, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-9492-608X
Noam KaplanDepartment of Physiology, Biophysics & Systems Biology, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-9940-1987

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Hi-C method has revolutionized the study of genome organization, yet interpretation of Hi-C interaction frequency maps remains a major challenge. Genomic compartments are a checkered Hi-C interaction pattern suggested to represent the partitioning of the genome into two self-interacting states associated with active and inactive chromatin. Based on a few elementary mechanistic assumptions, we derive a generative probabilistic model of genomic compartments, called deGeco. Testing our model, we find it can explain observed Hi-C interaction maps in a highly robust manner, allowing accurate inference of interaction probability maps from extremely sparse data without any training of parameters. Taking advantage of the interpretability of the model parameters, we then test hypotheses regarding the nature of genomic compartments. We find clear evidence of multiple states, and that these states self-interact with different affinities. We also find that the interaction rules of chromatin states differ considerably within and between chromosomes. Inspecting the molecular underpinnings of a four-state model, we show that a simple classifier can use histone marks to predict the underlying states with 87% accuracy. Finally, we observe instances of mixed-state loci and analyze these loci in single-cell Hi-C maps, finding that mixing of states occurs mainly at the cell level.

Indexed as

ChromatinGenomeChromosomesGenomicsProbabilityChromatin

Identifiers

PMID36629266
PMCPMC9943678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.