Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36629190›Full record

SynthesisThe Indian journal of medical research2022

A systematic review on hydroxyurea therapy for sickle cell disease in India.

Apoorva Pandey, Harpreet Kaur, Sapan Borah, Naveen Khargekar, Vijay Kumar Karra, Tulsi Adhikari, Dipty Jain, Manisha Madkaikar

Open access · diamondAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Indian journal of medical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Optimizing the "right" patient selection for treatment for sickle cell disease.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sickle cell disease in India: the journey and hope for the future.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Apoorva PandeyDivision of Epidemiological & Communicable Diseases, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Harpreet KaurDivision of Epidemiological & Communicable Diseases, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Sapan BorahDepartment of Haematogenetics, ICMR-National Institute of Immunohaematology, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Naveen KhargekarDepartment of Haematogenetics, ICMR-National Institute of Immunohaematology, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Vijay Kumar KarraDivision of Epidemiological & Communicable Diseases, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Tulsi AdhikariICMR-National Institute of Medical Statistics, New Delhi, India.
Dipty JainDepartment of Paediatrics, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Manisha MadkaikarDepartment of Paediatric Immunology & Leukocyte Immunology, ICMR-National Institute of Immunohaematology, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
ICMR - National Institute of Immunohaemotology · INIndian Council of Medical Research · INGovernment Medical College · INNational Institute of Medical Statistics · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & objectives: Sickle cell disease (SCD) constitutes frequently inherited haemoglobin disorders and poses a significant health burden in India. Hydroxyurea (HU), the most commonly used drug, has shown promising results in the clinical management of SCD. The present systematic review was undertaken to assess the efficacy and toxicity of HU in Indian sickle cell patients. Methods: A systematic review of studies on HU therapy was conducted to identify the application of HU and its outcome(s) across India. PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Library was used as data sources for various studies on the efficacy and toxicity of HU therapy for treatment for SCD in India published between January 2001 and October 2021. Two authors independently extracted the data on study design, patient characteristics and therapeutic outcomes of HU in order to determine the study quality of the present review. Results: Overall, 14 studies were included for a systematic analysis. Of these 11 were prospective, two cross-sectional and one double-blind randomized controlled trial. Low-dose HU (10 mg/kg/day) was found to reduce the rates of vaso-occlusive crisis and hospitalization as well as decreased the requirement of blood transfusion in SCD patients. The foetal haemoglobin (HbF) level was recorded in 13 (80%) studies all of whom reported an elevation in the HbF levels, with a mean increase in per cent HbF from 15.8 to 21.4 per cent across studies. The common adverse events were reversible, mild-to-moderate cytopenia and anaemia. Interpretation & conclusions: The findings of the present review suggest that there is still insufficient information presently to determine the long-term or major adverse effects on organ damage, fertility as well as pregnancy on the use of HU therapy for SCD. Long-term multi-centric studies are thus required to address these problems.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellHydroxyureaAntisickling AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntisickling AgentsHydroxyureaFoetal haemoglobinhaemoglobinopathieshospitalizationhydroxyureasickle cell diseasevaso-occlusive crisis

Identifiers

PMID36629190
PMCPMC10057355
OpenAlexW4315619222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.