Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36629173›Full record

ReviewEndoscopic ultrasound

The ultrasound use of simulators, current view, and perspectives: Requirements and technical aspects (WFUMB state of the art paper).

Christoph F Dietrich, Claudia Lucius, Michael Bachmann Nielsen, Eike Burmester, Susan Campbell Westerway, Chit Yan Chu, George Condous, Xin-Wu Cui, Yi Dong, Gill Harrison and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Innovations in ultrasound training in obstetrics.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Christoph F DietrichDepartment of Internal Medicine (DAIM), Hirslanden Private Hospital Bern, Beau Site, Salem und Permanence, Bern, Switzerland.
Claudia LuciusDepartment of Gastroenterology, IBD Centre, Poliklinik Helios Klinikum Buch, Berlin, Germany.
Michael Bachmann NielsenDepartment of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eike BurmesterDepartment of Internal Medicine (DAIM), Sana Hospital, Luebeck, Germany.
Susan Campbell WesterwayDepartment of Internal Medicine (DAIM), Faculty of Science and Health, Charles Sturt University, NSW, Australia.
Chit Yan ChuDepartment of Internal Medicine (DAIM), Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy and Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
George CondousDepartment of Internal Medicine (DAIM), Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy and Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Xin-Wu CuiDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.
Yi DongDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Gill HarrisonSociety and College of Radiographers, London, UK.
Jonas KochDepartment of Internal Medicine (DAIM), Hirslanden Private Hospital Bern, Beau Site, Salem und Permanence, Bern, Switzerland.
Barbara KrausDepartment of Internal Medicine (DAIM), University of Applied Sciences FH Campus Wien, Health Sciences, Radiological Technology, Sonography, Vienna, Austria.
Christian Pállson NolsøeDepartment of Surgery, Centre for Surgical Ultrasound, Zealand University Hospital, Køge; Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Leizl Joy NayahanganCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Malene Roland V PedersenDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Region of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Adrian SaftoiuDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Elias Emergency University Hospital, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila" Bucharest, Romania.
Eric SavitskyRonald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, UCLA Emergency Medicine Residency Program, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Michael BlaivasDepartment of Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simulation has been shown to improve clinical learning outcomes, speed up the learning process and improve learner confidence, whilst initially taking pressure off busy clinical lists. The World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) state of the art paper on the use of simulators in ultrasound education introduces ultrasound simulation, its advantages and challenges. It describes different simulator types, including low and high-fidelity simulators, the requirements and technical aspects of simulators, followed by the clinical applications of ultrasound simulation. The paper discusses the role of ultrasound simulation in ultrasound clinical training, referencing established literature. Requirements for successful ultrasound simulation acceptance into educational structures are explored. Despite being in its infancy, ultrasound simulation already offers a wide range of training opportunities and likely holds the key to a broader point of care ultrasound education for medical students, practicing doctors, and other health care professionals. Despite the drawbacks of simulation, there are also many advantages, which are expanding rapidly as the technology evolves.

Indexed as

Simulatorstrainingultrasound

Identifiers

PMID36629173
PMCPMC10134935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.