Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36628586›Full record

Trial reportJournal of applied clinical medical physics2023

How many brain metastases can be treated with stereotactic radiosurgery before the radiation dose delivered to normal brain tissue rivals that associated with standard whole brain radiotherapy?

Stewart J Becker, Evan J Lipson, Gabor Jozsef, Jason K Molitoris, Joshua S Silverman, Joseph Presser, Douglas Kondziolka

Open access · goldFull text readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A predictive model for Gamma Knife intermediate dose spill: R50%Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Stewart J BeckerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Evan J LipsonBloomberg∼Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy and Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Gabor JozsefDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Jason K MolitorisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Joshua S SilvermanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Joseph PresserDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai South Nassau, Oceanside, New York, USA.
Douglas KondziolkaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
NYU Langone Health · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USCornell University · USSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · USSouth Nassau Communities Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionClinical trial data comparing outcomes after administration of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) to patients with brain metastases (BM) suggest that SRS better preserves cognitive function and quality of life without negatively impacting overall survival. Here, we estimate the maximum number of BM that can be treated using single and multi-session SRS while limiting the dose of radiation delivered to normal brain tissue to that associated with WBRT.

methodsMultiple-tumor SRS was simulated using a Monte Carlo - type approach and a pre-calculated dose kernel method. Tumors with diameters ≤36 mm were randomly placed throughout the contoured brain parenchyma until the brain mean dose reached 3 Gy, equivalent to the radiation dose delivered during a single fraction of a standard course of WBRT (a total dose of 30 Gy in 10 daily fractions of 3 Gy). Distribution of tumor sizes, dose coverage, selectivity, normalization, and maximum dose data used in the simulations were based on institutional clinical metastases data.

resultsThe mean number of tumors treated, mean volume of healthy brain tissue receiving > 12 Gy (V12) per tumor, and total tumor volume treated using mixed tumor size distributions were 12.7 ± 4.2, 2.2 cc, and 12.9 cc, respectively. Thus, we estimate that treating 12-13 tumors per day over 10 days would deliver the dose of radiation to healthy brain tissue typically associated with a standard course of WBRT.

conclusionAlthough in clinical practice, treatment with SRS is often limited to patients with ≤15 BM, our findings suggest that many more lesions could be targeted while still minimizing the negative impacts on quality of life and neurocognition often associated with WBRT. Results from this in silico analysis require clinical validation.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryBrainCranial IrradiationHumansQuality of LifeRadiation DosageRetrospective Studiesbrain metastasesgamma kniferadiation toxicitystereotactic radiosurgerywhole brain radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID36628586
PMCPMC10018670
OpenAlexW4315620599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read16
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.