Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36628349›Full record

ReviewJournal of pharmacopuncture2022

Polysaccharides Obtained from Vegetables: an effective source of alternative excipient.

Ananta Choudhury, Satyabrat Sarma, Snehashis Sarkar, Madhusmita Kumari, Biplab Kumar Dey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pharmacopuncture, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ananta ChoudhuryFaculty of Pharmaceutical Science, Assam Down Town University, Guwahati, Assam, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6894-1670
Satyabrat SarmaFaculty of Pharmaceutical Science, Assam Down Town University, Guwahati, Assam, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7910-7243
Snehashis SarkarFaculty of Pharmaceutical Science, Assam Down Town University, Guwahati, Assam, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2179-5485
Madhusmita KumariFaculty of Pharmaceutical Science, Assam Down Town University, Guwahati, Assam, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5934-6677
Biplab Kumar DeyFaculty of Pharmaceutical Science, Assam Down Town University, Guwahati, Assam, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9672-3478

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polymers are the major constructive material of pharmaceutical formulations that play a prime role in designing effective drug-delivery systems and releasing drugs at their sites of application. Polymers are composed of multiple repeating units of high molecular mass components with attendant properties. Most synthetic polymers are non-biocompatible, expensive, and extremely inclined to deliver adverse impacts. Meanwhile, edible polymers obtained from natural sources have gained remarkable recognition for their promising use in modern medicine. Moreover, polymers derived from natural sources are generally preferred due to certain of their unique features such as abundant availability, biocompatibility, nontoxicity, economical, safe, and effective functions that fit the purpose. Polysaccharides including starch, cellulose, hemicellulose, pectin, and mucilage are identified as a major class of naturally obtained molecules that have a substantial role as functional polymers. This review summarizes the potential role of polysaccharides derived from vegetable sources such as adhesives, anticaking agents, binders, disintegrants, emulsifiers, film-framing agents, and thickeners. This is simply an opportunity to abandon synthetic excipients that hurt our bodies and think back to nature from where we originate.

Indexed as

excipientsnatural polymerspharmaceutical excipientspolysaccharidesvegetable polysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID36628349
PMCPMC9806151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.