Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36628283›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2022

Selection of endpoints in breast cancer clinical trials: a qualitative study of key trial stakeholders.

Wanyuan Cui, Kelly-Anne Phillips, Richard A Anderson, Prudence A Francis, Sherene Loi, Sibylle Loibl, Ann H Partridge, Louise A Keogh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Wanyuan CuiThe Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne 3000, VIC, Australia.
Kelly-Anne PhillipsThe Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne 3000, VIC, Australia.
Richard A AndersonMRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh 47 Little France Crescent Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK.
Prudence A FrancisThe Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne 3000, VIC, Australia.
Sherene LoiThe Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne 3000, VIC, Australia.
Sibylle LoiblGerman Breast Group Martin Behaim Strasse 12, Neu-Isenburg 63263, Germany.
Ann H PartridgeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute 450 Brookline Ave, Boston MA 02215, USA.
Louise A KeoghCentre for Health Equity, The University of Melbourne Parkville 3010, VIC, Australia.
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUCardiovascular Center Bethanien · DEDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USMRC Centre for Reproductive Health · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical trial endpoints are fundamental for evaluating the safety and efficacy of cancer therapies, yet it is not well understood how they are selected or the role of stakeholder groups in deciding endpoints. This study aimed to explore how clinical trial endpoints are selected in breast cancer trials of anti-cancer drugs through semi structured interviews with purposively selected stakeholders involved in breast cancer clinical trials (clinicians, consumers, pharmaceutical company representatives, and members of drug regulatory agencies). Participants were asked to describe the process of selecting trial endpoints. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using inductive thematic analysis supported by NVivo software. Saturation of the main themes was reached and the final sample included 25 participants from 14 countries (9 clinicians, 7 consumers, 5 members of regulatory agencies, 4 pharmaceutical company representatives). Pharmaceutical companies were almost always identified as the main decision maker. While most consumers and pharmaceutical company representatives felt clinicians and consumers influenced trial design, some clinicians and regulators reported consumers and clinicians had little influence. Factors identified as important considerations in determining trial endpoints included the main goal of the trial, established standardised endpoints, resources, and the investigational agent studied. All pharmaceutical advisors reported that meeting the requirements for regulatory approval was the major factor considered. Clinical trial endpoint selection is largely decided by the pharmaceutical industry, driven by requirements for regulatory approval. Given the limited influence from clinicians and consumers, guidance by regulatory agencies will be important for future inclusion of novel endpoints in clinical trials.

Indexed as

breast cancerClinical trialendpoints

Identifiers

PMID36628283
PMCPMC9827081
OpenAlexW4315619318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.