Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36628279›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2022

Prognostic implications of microRNA-21 overexpression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: an international multicenter study of 686 patients.

Asif Ali, Nigel Balfour Jamieson, Ishaq N Khan, David Chang, Elisa Giovannetti, Nicola Funel, Adam E Frampton, Jennifer Morton, Owen Sansom, Thomas R Jeffry Evans and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. miRNAs in pancreatic cancer progression and metastasis.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Asif AliInstitute of Cancer Sciences, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow UK.
Nigel Balfour JamiesonInstitute of Cancer Sciences, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow UK.
Ishaq N KhanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Joe H. Reynolds Medical Bld, Texas A&M University, College Station United States.
David ChangInstitute of Cancer Sciences, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow UK.
Elisa GiovannettiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nicola FunelCancer Pharmacology Lab, AIRC Start-Up Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa Pisa, Italy.
Adam E FramptonDepartment of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College, Hammersmith Hospital Campus Du Cane Road, London, UK.
Jennifer MortonBeatson Institute for Cancer Research, University of Glasgow UK.
Owen SansomBeatson Institute for Cancer Research, University of Glasgow UK.
Thomas R Jeffry EvansCR-UK Beatson Institute, University of Glasgow Glasgow, UK.
Fraser DuthieDepartment of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Building, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Greater Glasgow & Clyde NHS.
Colin J McKayWest of Scotland Pancreatic Unit and Glasgow Royal Infirmary Alexandra Parade, Glasgow.
Jas SamraDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital Pacific Highway St Leonards, Australia.
Anthony J GillSydney Medical School, University of Sydney Sydney, Australia.
Andrew BiankinInstitute of Cancer Sciences, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow UK.
Karin A OienInstitute of Cancer Sciences, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow UK.
Queen Elizabeth University Hospital · GBGulf Medical University · AE

Funding

Cancer Research UK 29996
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite progress in genomic characterization, no single prognostic marker that can be evaluated using an easy-to-perform and relatively inexpensive method is available for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). MicroRNAs, which are stable, tumor- and tissue-specific molecules, are potentially ideal biomarkers, and we established an inter-laboratory validated method to investigate miR-21 as a prognostic biomarker in PDAC. The study samples of PDAC patients were recruited from a test cohort of Glasgow (n = 189) and three validation cohorts of Pisa (n = 69), Sydney (n = 249), and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) (n = 249). Tissue microarrays were used for miR-21 staining by chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH). The patients were subdivided into no/low and high miR-21 staining groups using a specific histoscore. Furthermore, miR-21 staining was evaluated against clinicopathological variables and follow-up data by Fisher/log-rank test and Cox proportional models. The prognostic variables found to be significant in univariate analysis (

Indexed as

chromogenic in-situ hybridizationgemcitabine adjuvant chemotherapyMiR-21overall survivalPancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaprognosistissue microarrays

Identifiers

PMID36628279
PMCPMC9827095
OpenAlexW4315619046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.