ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2022
DeepCIA: a novel deep-learning model for cancer type identification using class activation map via transcription factor expression.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning methods are powerful analytical tools for large-scale data analysis. Here, we introduce DeepCIA as a novel diagnostic deep-learning model for cancer type identification using a class activation map via transcription factor expression. Although many deep learning researches attempts have recently been made in relation to cancer diagnosis, there are difficulties in using cancer data due to a large-scale problem. Therefore, From The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) public databases, we selected transcription factor expression profiles of eight cancer types. TCGA included 3496 samples and divided the train and validation sets in an 8:2 ratio. ICGC included 552 samples and was used as a test set for external validation. To compare the performance of 1D-CNN models, we also used SVM and KNN from machine learning. In external validation, 1D-CNN showed a high average accuracy of 98% and was superior to support vector machine (SVM) and k-nearest neighbor (KNN) with a difference in the accuracy of 10-12%. Also, 1D-CNN performed very well in several performance metrics (98.2% Recall, 98.1% Precision, 98.2% F score, 99.8% Specificity, 99.8% AUC, and 99.0% Balanced Accuracy). In each data set evaluation, 1-network, 5-network, and 2-network with high accuracy were selected and visualized through the Class Activation Map. We identified the Cys2Hys2 zinc finger group with the highest distribution across all cancer types. Collectively, DeepCIA can be used as a decision support system for cancer and a classifier for diagnosing unknown primary cancer, while emphasizing its usefulness in cancer diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36628273PMC9827098W4315620545What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.