Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36628269›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2023

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation in intensive care for COVID-19: randomised controlled trial.

Ana Cristina Carvalho, Jorge Moreira, Pedro Cubelo, Pedro Cantista, Catarina Aguiar Branco, Bruno Guimarães

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ana Cristina CarvalhoPublic Health Unit - Porto Oriental, ACeS Grande Porto VI, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5064-2042
Jorge MoreiraDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Centro Hospitalar de Entre o Douro e Vouga, Santa Maria da Feira, Portugal.
Pedro CubeloDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Centro Hospitalar de Entre o Douro e Vouga, Santa Maria da Feira, Portugal.
Pedro CantistaInstituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Catarina Aguiar BrancoDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Centro Hospitalar de Entre o Douro e Vouga, Santa Maria da Feira, Portugal.
Bruno GuimarãesDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Centro Hospitalar de Entre o Douro e Vouga, Santa Maria da Feira, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to an increasing number of patients in intensive care units (ICUs). The size of this post-ICU cohort will be unprecedented, with many patients vulnerable to post-intensive care syndrome. We analysed the respiratory and functional effects of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme on functional performance, in patients hospitalised in the ICU due to COVID-19. We conducted a randomised controlled clinical trial. 96 patients who fulfilled the eligibility criteria were randomised into control or intervention group. The control group received standard of care in the ICU, and the intervention group received a functional and respiratory rehabilitation protocol that included medical, nursing, physiotherapy and occupational therapy interventions. At discharge, the intervention group showed significantly better muscular strength and respiratory capacity, and significantly fewer days of hospitalisation (12.90±5.8

Identifiers

PMID36628269
PMCPMC9571162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.