ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2022
Deciphering cervical cancer-associated biomarkers by integrated multi-omics approach.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role and therapeutic value of NUSAP1 in human cancers.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Chromatin Licensing and DNA Replication Factor 1 (CDT1) Is a Potential Prognostic Biomarker Involved in the Malignant Biological Behavior of Glioma.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024Article
- CDC45 promotes the stemness and metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma by affecting the cell cycle.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Comprehensive analysis of immune-related genes for classification and immune microenvironment of asthma.American journal of translational research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesCervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma (CESC) is one of the most fatal female malignancies, and the underlying molecular mechanisms governing this disease have not been fully explored. In this research, we planned to conduct the analysis of Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) cervical squamous cell carcinoma microarray datasets by a detailed
methodsThe top commonly differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from the GSE138080 and GSE113942 datasets were analyzed by Limma package-based GEO2R tool. The protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of the DEGs was drawn through Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING), and top 6 hub genes were obtained from Cytoscape. Expression analysis and validation of hub genes expression in CESC samples and cell lines were done using UALCAN, OncoDB, GENT2, and HPA. Additionally, cBioPortal, Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) tool, Kaplan-Meier (KM) plotter, ShinyGO, and DGIdb databases were also used to check some important values of hub genes in CESC.
resultsOut of 79 DEGs, the minichromosome maintenance complex component 4 (MCM4), nucleolar and spindle-associated protein 1 (NUSAP1), cell division cycle associated 5 (CDCA5), cell division cycle 45 (CDC45), denticleless E3 ubiquitin protein ligase homolog (DTL), and chromatin licensing and DNA replication factor 1 (CDT1) genes were regarded as hub genes in CESC. Further analysis revealed that the expressions of all these hub genes were significantly elevated in CESC cell lines and samples of diverse clinical attributes. In this study, we also documented some important correlations between hub genes and some other diverse measures, including DNA methylation, genetic alterations, and Overall Survival (OS). Last, we also identify hub genes associated ceRNA network and 31 important chemotherapeutic drugs.
conclusionThrough detailed
Indexed as
Identifiers
36628250PMC9827308W4315620663What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.