Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36628226›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2022

Biomechanical evaluation of percutaneous anterograde and retrograde screw implantation for superior ramus pubis fractures: a finite element analysis.

Ling Xu, Xiaolu Cao, Hui Lu, Dingxi Liu, Qimei Wu, Rong Liu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ling XuSchool of Medicine, Wuhan University of Science and Technology No. 1, Huangjia Lake University Town, Wuhan 430065, China.
Xiaolu CaoDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Medicine, Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Occupational Hazard Identification and Control, Wuhan University of Science and Technology Wuhan 430080, China.
Hui LuSchool of Medicine, Wuhan University of Science and Technology No. 1, Huangjia Lake University Town, Wuhan 430065, China.
Dingxi LiuInstitute of Medical Innovation and Transformation, Puren Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology 1 Benxi Road, Wuhan 430081, China.
Qimei WuWuhan Liu Sanwu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Xinzhou District, Wuhan 430081, Hubei Province, China.
Rong LiuSchool of Medicine, Wuhan University of Science and Technology No. 1, Huangjia Lake University Town, Wuhan 430065, China.
Wuhan University of Technology · CNWuhan City Chinese Medicine Hospital · CNWuhan University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the biomechanical characteristics of percutaneous anterograde and retrograde screw implantation for superior ramus pubis fractures.

methodsMimics software was used to reconstruct the normal pelvis. 3-Matic software was used to establish a model for superior ramus pubis fracture, and percutaneous anterograde/retrograde screw implantation was used to simulate the treatment of a superior ramus pubis fracture. After material assignment by Mimics software, Ansys software simulated the force of a standing position with a 600 N load on an S1 vertebral endplate and then compared the mechanical stability.

resultsAfter simulating the fracture at five points, the effect of anterograde and retrograde screw implantation on the displacement and stress of the pelvis and the left pubic bone were found to be similar. When anterograde screw implantation was used, screw displacement at each point was 1.10 mm, 1.04 mm, 1.10 mm, 1.10 mm, and 1.07 mm; the stress at each point was 14.95 MPa, 11.50 MPa, 18.60 MPa, 18.07 MPa, and 18.37 MPa. When retrograde screw implantation was used, screw displacement at each point was 0.62 mm, 0.62 mm, 0.70 mm, 0.76 mm, and 0.87 mm; and the stress at each point was 5.13 MPa, 4.03 MPa, 6.61 MPa, 9.74 MPa, and 11.55 MPa respectively.

conclusionsWhen assessing the treatment of superior ramus pubis fractures from a biomechanical perspective, we found that if the distance between the fracture line and the insertion point is less than 70 mm, it is recommended to use retrograde screw implantation.

Indexed as

Anterograde screw implantationfinite element analysisretrograde screw implantationsuperior ramus pubis fractures

Identifiers

PMID36628226
PMCPMC9827299
OpenAlexW4315620240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.