ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2022
Biomechanical evaluation of percutaneous anterograde and retrograde screw implantation for superior ramus pubis fractures: a finite element analysis.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the biomechanical characteristics of percutaneous anterograde and retrograde screw implantation for superior ramus pubis fractures.
methodsMimics software was used to reconstruct the normal pelvis. 3-Matic software was used to establish a model for superior ramus pubis fracture, and percutaneous anterograde/retrograde screw implantation was used to simulate the treatment of a superior ramus pubis fracture. After material assignment by Mimics software, Ansys software simulated the force of a standing position with a 600 N load on an S1 vertebral endplate and then compared the mechanical stability.
resultsAfter simulating the fracture at five points, the effect of anterograde and retrograde screw implantation on the displacement and stress of the pelvis and the left pubic bone were found to be similar. When anterograde screw implantation was used, screw displacement at each point was 1.10 mm, 1.04 mm, 1.10 mm, 1.10 mm, and 1.07 mm; the stress at each point was 14.95 MPa, 11.50 MPa, 18.60 MPa, 18.07 MPa, and 18.37 MPa. When retrograde screw implantation was used, screw displacement at each point was 0.62 mm, 0.62 mm, 0.70 mm, 0.76 mm, and 0.87 mm; and the stress at each point was 5.13 MPa, 4.03 MPa, 6.61 MPa, 9.74 MPa, and 11.55 MPa respectively.
conclusionsWhen assessing the treatment of superior ramus pubis fractures from a biomechanical perspective, we found that if the distance between the fracture line and the insertion point is less than 70 mm, it is recommended to use retrograde screw implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36628226PMC9827299W4315620240What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.