Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36628133›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative methods

Critical Reflections on Conducting Qualitative Health Research During COVID-19: The Lived Experiences of a Cohort of Postgraduate Students in a South African University.

Jennifer Nyawira Githaiga, Carmen Späth, Namhla Sicwebu, Shehani Perera, Tsidiso Tolla, Natalie Leon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative methods. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Conducting and Writing Quantitative and Qualitative Research.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer Nyawira GithaigaDivision of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4511-9393
Carmen SpäthDivision of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Namhla SicwebuDivision of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Shehani PereraDivision of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Tsidiso TollaDivision of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Natalie LeonHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
University of Cape Town · ZASouth African Medical Research Council · ZA

Funding

Building Research in Inter-Disciplinary Gender and HIV through the Social Sciences (The BRIDGES Programme)D43TW011308 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN · PI COLVIN, CHRISTOPHER JAMES · 2019 to 2023
$1.7M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW011308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 ushered in public health guidelines restricting face-to-face contact and movement, and encouraging social distancing, all of which had implications for conducting field-based research during the pandemic. For qualitative researchers, this meant adapting conventional face-to-face methods and resorting to virtual variations of the same in adherence to stipulated COVID-19 health protocols. Virtual qualitative research introduced new concerns and logistical challenges. This paper presents critical reflections on experiences of conducting qualitative research during the pandemic, from the perspectives of a cohort of postgraduate fellows. A critical reflection framework was utilised to explore fellows experiences and meanings ascribed to their experiences. The research findings illustrate three overarching processes which, in turn, shaped ways of thinking, doing and being. First, explicating tacit assumptions about their anticipated research journeys and interrogating these. Second, shifts in power differentials demonstrated by role reversal between researchers and participants, and between fellows and supervisors as they re-negotiated their positionalities in virtual research spaces. Third, context specific sense-making, in which - narrative accounts support the notion of knowledge as a social construct. Our findings have important implications for qualitative research practice. Our study documents methodological nuances and social implications of conducting qualitative research during COVID-19 and in a-South African context. In addition, our study exemplifies the use of critical reflection in qualitative research practice in the specific context of postgraduate academic research. Further, our study illustrates how the use of technology shapes qualitative research protocol development, data collection and analysis phases.

Indexed as

COVID-19critical reflectionqualitative researchSouth Africavirtual research

Identifiers

PMID36628133
PMCPMC9813641
OpenAlexW4313477173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.