Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36628109›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2023

Prognosis of COVID-19 patients using lab tests: A data mining approach.

Fariba Khounraz, Mahmood Khodadoost, Saeid Gholamzadeh, Rashed Pourhamidi, Tayebeh Baniasadi, Aida Jafarbigloo, Gohar Mohammadi, Mahnaz Ahmadi, Seyed Mohammad Ayyoubzadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fariba KhounrazAdministration and Resources Development Affairs Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Mahmood KhodadoostSchool of Traditional Medicine, Traditional Medicine & Materia Medical Research Center Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Saeid GholamzadehAdministration and Resources Development Affairs Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Rashed PourhamidiNon Communicable Diseases Research Center, Bam University of Medical Sciences Bam Iran.
Tayebeh BaniasadiDepartment of Health Information Technology, Faculty of Para-Medicine Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences Bandar Abbas Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0212-291X
Aida JafarbiglooDepartment of Health Information Technology, School of Allied Medical Sciences Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Gohar MohammadiAdministration and Resources Development Affairs Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Mahnaz AhmadiDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology, School of Pharmacy Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Seyed Mohammad AyyoubzadehDepartment of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8450-7818

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The rapid prevalence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused a pandemic worldwide and affected the lives of millions. The potential fatality of the disease has led to global public health concerns. Apart from clinical practice, artificial intelligence (AI) has provided a new model for the early diagnosis and prediction of disease based on machine learning (ML) algorithms. In this study, we aimed to make a prediction model for the prognosis of COVID-19 patients using data mining techniques. Methods: In this study, a data set was obtained from the intelligent management system repository of 19 hospitals at Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in Iran. All patients admitted had shown positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test results. They were hospitalized between February 19 and May 12 in 2020, which were investigated in this study. The extracted data set has 8621 data instances. The data include demographic information and results of 16 laboratory tests. In the first stage, preprocessing was performed on the data. Then, among 15 laboratory tests, four of them were selected. The models were created based on seven data mining algorithms, and finally, the performances of the models were compared with each other. Results: Based on our results, the Random Forest (RF) and Gradient Boosted Trees models were known as the most efficient methods, with the highest accuracy percentage of 86.45% and 84.80%, respectively. In contrast, the Decision Tree exhibited the least accuracy (75.43%) among the seven models. Conclusion: Data mining methods have the potential to be used for predicting outcomes of COVID-19 patients with the use of lab tests and demographic features. After validating these methods, they could be implemented in clinical decision support systems for better management and providing care to severe COVID-19 patients.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceCOVID‐19data miningGradient Boosted Treesmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID36628109
PMCPMC9826741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.